Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+ofdm\s+in\s+2\.4ghz\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+ofdm\s+in\s+2\.4ghz\?\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 00:35:39 -0400; Kevin, What about the 802.11g radio's from broadcom (isn't broadcom used in your NDIS hardware solution?) Dan [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] some know Cabral -- [This E-mail scanned for virus; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00000.html (10,448 bytes)
2. RE: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 17:09:47 -0500; The NDIS driver we have ONLY works with AGERE chipsets- not Broadcom. Kevin Kevin, What about the 802.11g radio's from broadcom (isn't broadcom used in your NDIS hardware solution?) Dan [mailto:karln; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00007.html (11,565 bytes)
3. RE: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 19:48:13 -0400; Aren't the wet11's broadcom based? Isn't that an NDIS type system? -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00008.html (13,459 bytes)
4. RE: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: "tonylist" <tonylist@demarctech.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 08:29:45 -0400; Dan They are Intersil 3.0 and its not a NDIS type system from what I understand. Think about it, the unit needs to bridge between two interfaces where NDIS is just a single interface. Sincerely, Tony; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00010.html (15,155 bytes)
5. RE: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 07:36:03 -0500; The WET 11's are UBICOM based. UBICOM makes a single chip solution, but NOT a radio card. The WET 11s have an Intersil card I believe. Aren't the wet11's broadcom based? Isn't that an NDIS type syste; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00011.html (13,923 bytes)
6. RE: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 09:11:39 -0400; Ah, thanks for the info -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00014.html (15,632 bytes)
7. RE: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:27:11 -0400; Any chance of karlnet support the new ofdm 2.4ghz radio's? -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00244.html (8,170 bytes)
8. RE: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:35:51 -0500; Dan, As I understand it, "G" radios are all OFDM. Yes we will be supporting them. Kevin Any chance of karlnet support the new ofdm 2.4ghz radio's? -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00245.html (8,701 bytes)
9. Re: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:07:03 -0500; Is there a one paragraph explanation of OFDM that someone could post. I am not sure I understand it. Is it a 'near line of sight' technology?; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00246.html (9,764 bytes)
10. Re: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: "Bruno Lopes F. Cabral" <bruno@openline.com.br>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:18:01 -0300; Hi there I made the exact same question about newer proxym "g" radios a few days ago, and got no answer if it will be suported, when and which cards would be used? side note: I heard about new proxy; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00247.html (8,423 bytes)
11. Re: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: Roger Boggs <rogerboggs@att.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:27:35 -0400; http://www.wave-report.com/tutorials/OFDM.htm http://www.wi-lan.com/library/whitepaper_wofdm_general.pdf At 08:07 AM 7/31/03 -0500, you wrote: Is there a one paragraph explanation of OFDM that someon; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00248.html (8,763 bytes)
12. Re: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: Darko Delic <darko@tradal.net>; Date: 31 Jul 2003 16:41:44 +0300; you are correct only gold card have external connector mfg# 8410-WD this one can be used in AP mfg# 8420-WD only for windows but as I have read somewhere that in silver cards external connector is on; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00249.html (9,285 bytes)
13. Re: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:44:25 -0500; So, in practice what benefits are people seeing? Will a marginal link due to trees improve with ofdm? am; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00250.html (9,133 bytes)
14. RE: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: Thomas Giger TGC <thomas.giger@tgc.de>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:47:05 +0200; The benefits: Higher data rates The physics: If more information is encoded (at the same bandwidth of 20 MHz), more energy is needed. That is, you will see an increase from -82 dB receiver sensitivit; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00251.html (9,973 bytes)
15. RE: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:42:57 -0500; All, We are planning on supporting the Atheros radios. However- there is some concern about wether they will pass outdoor certification. We should know more in the next few weeks on that issue, and I; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00254.html (9,193 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]