- 1. [NA-User] No auto split op? (score: 1)
- Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb)
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 00:01:51 +0000
- Re: V10.53/FT1000MP Any way to automatically have NA pick up the split freq from spots and automatically put it into VFO B? It also does not seem to report the split when you announce a spot. One doe
- /archives//html/NA-User/2001-10/msg00020.html (6,839 bytes)
- 2. [NA-User] No auto split op? (score: 1)
- Author: k8cc@mediaone.net (k8cc)
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 22:14:03 -0500
- To the best of my knowledge, there is no "official" format for the split data in a spot coming from a cluster. Without a standard format, it is difficult (if not impossible) to parse out the data rel
- /archives//html/NA-User/2001-10/msg00021.html (7,491 bytes)
- 3. [NA-User] No auto split op? (score: 1)
- Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
- Date: 29 Oct 2001 04:05:59 -0800
- While it may be true that there's no "official" format, there is one, at least, semi-official, that CT uses fairly reliably and that's to utilize spots that have entered in their comment field the li
- /archives//html/NA-User/2001-10/msg00022.html (7,832 bytes)
- 4. [NA-User] No auto split op? (score: 1)
- Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert)
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:31:08 -0500
- There is no official format. But CT, being one of the first out there, set the defacto format to be: DX <callsign> <RX freq> QSX <TX freq> The word QSX is required, and <TX freq> must be in KHz. Note
- /archives//html/NA-User/2001-10/msg00023.html (7,997 bytes)
- 5. [NA-User] No auto split op? (score: 1)
- Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
- Date: 29 Oct 2001 06:45:29 -0800
- Oops. Big oops. Jim is absolutely correct. The problem comes in when people type "QSX UP" or "QSX UP 5" instead of "QSX 7223" in the comment field. I should know better...too early... Anyway, if the
- /archives//html/NA-User/2001-10/msg00024.html (8,931 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu