Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+160M\/Modem\s+problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+160M\/Modem\s+problem\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] 160M/Modem problem (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki <n6pe@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:37:24 -0800 (PST); Thanks to all that responded. The SNR on my DSL line is unaffected by any amount of ferrite I hang on the line, so that is good. However, the recommended filter using four 6.8uh chokes and 3 caps com; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00058.html (7,036 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] 160M/Modem problem (score: 1): Author: Aaron Kreider <aaron@campusactivism.org>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:09:19 -0500; Does anyone have experience using Cat 6 to reduce noise? I recently bought some Cat 6 cables as my understanding is that they've got more shielding. Aaron Rick, N6PE _________________________________; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00059.html (6,986 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] 160M/Modem problem (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:04:45 -0800; CAT5, CAT6, and all variations thereof consists of four very good twisted pairs, each twisted at a different rate to minimize crosstalk from one pair to another. It is NOT shielded. Twisted pair cabl; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00060.html (7,917 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] 160M/Modem problem (score: 1): Author: Aaron Kreider <aaron@campusactivism.org>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:17:53 -0500; It isn't default, but I think there is shielded Cat 6. This one is called Cat 6a. Screened Shielded Twisted Pair http://www.amazon.com/Cable-Matters-Screened-Shielded-Snagless/dp/B004NPOPWW/ref=sr_1_; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00067.html (8,814 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] 160M/Modem problem (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:11:50 -0800; On 12/19/2012 8:17 AM, Missouri Guy wrote: CAT5, CAT6, and all variations thereof consists of four very good twisted pairs, each twisted at a different rate to minimize crosstalk from one pair to ano; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00069.html (9,582 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] 160M/Modem problem (score: 1): Author: "Dale Svetanoff" <svetanoff@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:25:09 -0600; Jim and All, Yes, UTP is used almost universally now for high speed data because it works so well. However, STP ("Shielded Twisted Pair") has been available for quite some time, but in my experience,; /archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00074.html (11,801 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]