Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+AM\s+Broadcast\s+petition\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+AM\s+Broadcast\s+petition\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] AM Broadcast petition (score: 1): Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 22:02:20 -0400; Broadcast engineering consultant Richard Arsenault has petitioned the FCC to allow AM broadcast stations to increase power levels anywhere from 4 to 10 times present levels. Rationale (quoting his pe; /archives//html/RFI/2010-05/msg00004.html (8,089 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] AM Broadcast petition (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller KG0KP" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 21:16:31 -0500; Wow, wonder if Amateurs could get 4 to 10 times increase also. 4 times INCREASE would be 7500 and 10 would be 16500 watts. Brings a whole new definition of the coax necessary and the safe distance fr; /archives//html/RFI/2010-05/msg00005.html (9,347 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] AM Broadcast petition (score: 1): Author: "WA3GIN" <wa3gin@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 22:20:37 -0400; Its not going to fly simply because its not carbon friendly... Sirius and XM are the future of broadcast radio, not the millions of low freq. watts being radiated all over the planet... even the VOA; /archives//html/RFI/2010-05/msg00006.html (8,270 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] AM Broadcast petition (score: 1): Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>; Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 22:29:39 -0500; It won't fly with this "regime" because conservative talk shows dominate the AM-BC spectrum. However, if Latino AM-BC interests join the petition it has a chance since they will do almost anything fo; /archives//html/RFI/2010-05/msg00007.html (8,709 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] AM Broadcast petition (score: 1): Author: "WA3GIN" <wa3gin@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 22:38:01 -0400; HAHA... ya think? If you mean those yoyos that cater to the dim extreme right and who helped run the country into the dirt for ten years then I'm all for QRP-AM... And I think you are a bit confused.; /archives//html/RFI/2010-05/msg00008.html (7,924 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] AM Broadcast petition (score: 1): Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 22:38:50 -0400; Well, you're right, it's not going to fly, for any number of reasons. But it does put out there, for everyone to hear from another segment of radio, the problems caused by the "creeping" cacophony of; /archives//html/RFI/2010-05/msg00009.html (7,872 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] AM Broadcast petition (score: 1): Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>; Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 22:56:07 -0500; I apologize to the list - I should not have included it in my Reply All. -- .Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E .Have an http://ultrafidian.com day! . . |_|___|_| . | | & | | . {| . /\ {| . / \ {| . / @ \ {| .; /archives//html/RFI/2010-05/msg00010.html (7,903 bytes)
8. Re: [RFI] AM Broadcast petition (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 22:59:54 -0400; One Coronal Mass ejection pointed at earth and we'll be navigatin' by the stars and listening to country and western through lots of static. Putting all our eggs in one basket where both communicatio; /archives//html/RFI/2010-05/msg00011.html (9,310 bytes)
9. Re: [RFI] AM Broadcast petition (score: 1): Author: Scott Holisky <sholisky@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 22:53:09 -0500; My AM consultant buddy told me 5 years ago that the measurable noise increase in metro areas had risen 13 dB over the last 10 years. The reason I asked was our stations EBS AM antenna reception had d; /archives//html/RFI/2010-05/msg00013.html (7,827 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] AM Broadcast petition (score: 1): Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>; Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 14:42:00 -0500; Whatever happened to digital AM-BC? Would that not overcome the problem? I am guessing the cost and the competition with converting TV derailed that but perhaps now is the time. I don't know if a dig; /archives//html/RFI/2010-05/msg00014.html (9,417 bytes)
11. Re: [RFI] AM Broadcast petition (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 18:09:45 -0700; It is alive, well, and ugly (because every transmitter that uses it splatters several channels wide, which clobbers weaker signals on adjacent channels). Although I haven't experienced it (there ain'; /archives//html/RFI/2010-05/msg00015.html (8,228 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]