Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+Board\s+of\s+Directors\s+resolution\s+related\s+to\s+FCCenforcement\s+of\s+radio\-interference\s+issues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+Board\s+of\s+Directors\s+resolution\s+related\s+to\s+FCCenforcement\s+of\s+radio\-interference\s+issues\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCCenforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1): Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 23:54:36 -0700; "Let's hope this doesn't fall on deaf ears in our Federal Government like so many other things." They already worked an easy out into it: "identification of the most urgent enforcement cases" Kurt __; /archives//html/RFI/2015-07/msg00116.html (8,389 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCCenforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 04:25:05 -0700; It sounds like the BOD intends make an issue of this subject with the FCC, lets hope so... It really is getting out of hand of late here in Oregon. Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups; /archives//html/RFI/2015-07/msg00117.html (9,814 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCCenforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 19:47:34 +0000; Actually, that's not really intended to be an easy out. If we want FCC enforcement to have teeth, the old paradigm will not work. We can't expect to identify a thousand RFI problems, turn them all ov; /archives//html/RFI/2015-07/msg00152.html (11,234 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCCenforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 23:17:47 -0500; And don't miss congress - " other Federal agencies with jurisdiction over rule violation instances; and as necessary, Congressional oversight authorities;" 73, Jim KG0KP It sounds like the BOD intend; /archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00000.html (8,625 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]