Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Another\s+Solar\s+Panel\s+Interference\s+Case\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dyer via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 12:32:41 -0700
And we appreciate all the work that is done by the ARRL as our representative body. I don't see ARRL Spectrum Defense Fund lists HF RFI as a key initiative. 73, Steve W1SRD Ed Here is where the FCC i
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00020.html (17,152 bytes)

22. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:08:40 +0000
QUOTE W2TTT, GORDON: " As for VZW and AT&T staffing, there are surprisingly few engineers available and equipped to troubleshoot noise and other forms of interference, but they do an excellent job wh
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00021.html (14,650 bytes)

23. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:25:34 -0600
Enough pointless hand wringing. Can we please stick to constructive suggestions ? 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00022.html (15,946 bytes)

24. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:31:18 +0000
Steve, I believe the real push here is to do something about the whole Solar Power industry when we have whole cities and states, California, especially, mandating all new construction be outfitted w
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00023.html (16,888 bytes)

25. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 21:01:44 +0000
In the short run, there is not much to do, but we are engaging that industry at the committee level, to see what kind of support we can all give to each other. If we can get them to join in the conce
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00024.html (10,767 bytes)

26. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:38:59 -0700
Indeed, we did, by electing a President who ran on small government, and continuing to elect Senators and Representatives who legislated it, legislated the budgets, and who have, as a group, taken bi
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00025.html (10,439 bytes)

27. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:39:22 -0700
Yep 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00026.html (9,813 bytes)

28. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:48:31 -0700
What many hams continue to miss is that for about the last 20 years, the MF and HF noise floor has increasing been dominated NOT by that generated by the power system, but by switch-mode power suppli
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00027.html (10,282 bytes)

29. [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Peterson" <kzerocx@rap.midco.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:18:46 -0600
I must have missed something. Whenever did government ever get smaller? The FCC fired engineers and hired more lawyers. Gary Smaller Government = Smaller FCC. Folks reap what they sow. 73, Ken, KJ9B
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00029.html (8,382 bytes)

30. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 23:50:39 +0000
You got it, Gary. And the lawyers have no idea what RF is and isn't. Dave - WØLEV -- *Dave - WØLEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contest
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00034.html (8,785 bytes)

31. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J via RFI" <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 13:05:39 +0000
Both political parties have changed the make-up of the FCC away from technical personnel like closing monitoring stations and offices under Obama's and other admins, to adding more and more lawyers a
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00040.html (11,880 bytes)

32. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 13:09:17 +0000
Well, for Amateur Radio, the ARRL Lab had a solution, and that was to do as much of the work as we could handle, allowing the FCC to do the parts only it can do. Ed Both political parties have change
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00041.html (12,283 bytes)

33. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 08:40:47 -0600
"Both political parties...". Yet the only person you mention is Obama. That shows your obvious bias. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.co
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00042.html (12,424 bytes)

34. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J via RFI" <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 14:59:20 +0000
Only in that many of the Monitoring Station closures, and specifically the one we had in Nebraska, happened under Obama. Im just not aware of exactly when all the others happened. And apparently sinc
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00043.html (13,824 bytes)

35. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 09:31:02 -0700
"Instead of complaining about the problem, does anyone have a real solution?" Yes, I provided on one February 15th. Kurt _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contestin
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00044.html (9,773 bytes)

36. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: MICHAEL ST ANGELO <mstangelo@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:43:48 -0400 (EDT)
My question is what is the problem in the public's eye? They only ones affected for the most part are Hams and the FCC no longer considers Amateur Radio as an Emergency service. Very few people liste
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00045.html (11,374 bytes)

37. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 18:11:28 -0600
When has the gov't shrunk?  I have a feeling this was a backhand swipe at our last President.  The FCC only cares about selling off the spectrum, What are they enforcing with all the lawyers or are t
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00046.html (9,665 bytes)

38. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:28:23 -0700
Reagan ran on it, and downsized agencies regulations intended to protect the public from big biz. That was the beginning of the end of the FCC. 73, Jim K9YC __________________________________________
/archives//html/RFI/2022-04/msg00047.html (8,875 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu