- 21. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 18:01:03 +0000
- Ed Hare, et.al: The FCC already has a line in the sand by dictating limits to which radiated and conducted emissions must stay below. That's what we measure for such parameters in an accredited lab t
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00057.html (15,455 bytes)
- 22. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 08:36:01 +0000
- To my knowledge, the senior staff at FCC have pretty much let the Enforcement Bureau do its job. Laura Smith has pretty much said, in one case from a ham who literally demanded an answer from her, th
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00098.html (13,668 bytes)
- 23. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 08:53:20 +0000
- Here is the list of the statements from the FCC Chair. I didn't see anything in the titles that looked as if it might contain the statement that Randy read, but maybe if he looks at the list, it will
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00099.html (13,791 bytes)
- 24. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: <wx5l@charter.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 07:50:55 -0600
- Ed, Please remove Ms. Rosenworcel from this conversation. It was Laura Smith, FCC Special Council, that made the comments what she considers harmful interference and that the FCC will not step in reg
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00101.html (16,368 bytes)
- 25. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 16:59:46 +0000
- Well put, Ed. However, addressing each reported RFI problem on a case-by-case basis is labor intensive. But, your statement and implied caution to all amateurs is the term " personal diplomacy". We a
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00103.html (17,235 bytes)
- 26. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 12:04:56 -0800
- Hi Dave, Like you, I'm well into my 6th decade as a ham, and in those years, I've paid as much attention to politics as to ham radio. The likelihood of FCC Regs being re-written to make them harder o
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00104.html (10,373 bytes)
- 27. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 21:34:40 +0000
- I believe that you are right, Jim, although the FCC regulates as much for the consumer as it does for business. FCC does not want to impose any more restrictions on business than is necessary to have
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00106.html (15,619 bytes)
- 28. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 21:39:39 +0000
- That is WAY different from "S6 to S9" so I am glad that I challenged that statement. That kind of hyperbole ends to damage a process that is, for the most part, working far better than we have had in
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00107.html (18,507 bytes)
- 29. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:04:11 -0500 (EST)
- Ed, Thanks for the explanation. We also have to remember Amateur Radio is a hobby and until other consumer or business services are affected there will be little incentive to impose stricter regulati
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00108.html (11,198 bytes)
- 30. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:12:31 -0800
- For many (most?) products, shielding is NOT required. FAR more significant are circuit design issues, like proper termination of cable shields and the power system "green wire," wave-shaping of power
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00109.html (12,426 bytes)
- 31. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 22:56:24 +0000
- Yes, Jim, the earth poles would have to shift for any change in the FCC rules regarding radiated emissioin philosophies and measurement techniques! Dave - WØLEV -- *Dave - WØLEV* ____________________
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00110.html (10,744 bytes)
- 32. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 23:12:51 +0000
- When I first started my work with the IEEE, and with some manufacturers, and especially with regulators, the image of amateur radio ranged from the bearded experimenters in the basement to the unreal
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00111.html (14,114 bytes)
- 33. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: Wes Stewart via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 02:28:21 +0000 (UTC)
- If a ham took the grid down, imagine what a hostile actor could do. Pointing out a vulnerability shouldn't be a game over, but a wake-up call. Wes N7WS There is one other major standards effort tha
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00112.html (11,209 bytes)
- 34. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 09:21:36 +0000
- Oh, the pointing out was not the game over, but even without hostile actors, it would not bode well for amateur radio if fixed or mobile transmitters in common use could cause smart-grid malfunctions
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00113.html (12,141 bytes)
- 35. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: N5KM - Kris <n5kilomike@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 16:08:55 -0600
- I think it will be up to the radio manufacturers to solve the interference problems we are facing. By that I mean developing algorithms that target specific RFI types. As processing technology advanc
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00114.html (8,493 bytes)
- 36. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave (NK7Z)" <dave@nk7z.net>
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 15:00:01 -0800
- Hi Kris, You can't put back what is missing, (QRN removes data in a lot of cases), you can only guess at what is missing and replace with that... Turn on your NB next time you do FT8, and count the d
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00115.html (9,918 bytes)
- 37. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 23:00:25 +0000
- Software: "It's in the hardware"....... Hardware: "It's in the software"........ NOT......... This one needs to be fixed in HARDWARE......... PERIOD....... Dave - W ØLEV -- *Dave - WØLEV* ___________
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00116.html (9,262 bytes)
- 38. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: James Gordon Beattie Jr <w2ttt@att.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 07:25:26 +0000
- So let's review... It's "OK" to produce poor quality electronics that generates RFI, because we can get someone else to filter said, "RFI" in order to function properly, thereby transferring the cost
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00117.html (11,043 bytes)
- 39. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: Dale <svetanoff@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 09:04:59 +0000
- Dave and Kris, Dave, you are correct - the "fix" is in hardware, but NOT in amateur radio equipment. The fix lies with the FCC and the solar system manufacturers. Alas, many manufacturers are not goi
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00118.html (12,516 bytes)
- 40. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave (NK7Z)" <dave@nk7z.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 07:13:00 -0800
- Hi Dale, For the most part that is not going to work well... No matter how much you talk to your next door neighbor if you interfere with their <insert device name here>, it is almost always your fau
- /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00119.html (13,323 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu