- 1. [RFI] BPL--FCC Proposed Rules//We Need to Respond (score: 1)
- Author: K4VV@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:47:19 EST
- For information, here is the action that we in the Potomac Valley Radio Club are taking. PVRC is a contesting club with several hundred active members in the mid Atlantic region. I am the current Pre
- /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00007.html (21,064 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RFI] BPL--FCC Proposed Rules//We Need to Respond (score: 1)
- Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 12:32:47 -0800 (PST)
- As I was rereading the NPRM today, I noticed something interesting that I haven't heard anyone else mention. -- Begin Quote -- Campus radio systems have been operating for over fifty years in the Uni
- /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00012.html (9,319 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RFI] BPL--FCC Proposed Rules//We Need to Respond (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 15:43:25 -0500
- At 12:32 PM 3/5/04 -0800, N6KJ wrote: The BPL proponents continue to insist that power lines will not radiate like an antenna and that their equipment appears as a "point-source" radiator. If that's
- /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00013.html (8,287 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RFI] BPL--FCC Proposed Rules//We Need to Respond (score: 1)
- Author: Martin Ewing <martin@aa6e.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 16:06:13 -0500
- We set up a carrier current AM system at our college in the 1960's. It had (IIRC) a 5 watt 540 kHz transmitter installed in each dormitory and coupled to the AC downstream from the pole transformer,
- /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00014.html (10,490 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu