Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+CFL\'s\s+\&\s+UV\s+\-\s+Hoax\s+or\s+Real\?\s+Real\s+but\s+Overstated\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated? (score: 1)
Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:52:33 -0500
Just received this from a family member and wondered if anyone has looked into it? http://www.globaltv.com/globaltv/globalshows/16x9/video.html?maven_playerId=16x9extralargeplayer&maven_referralPlayl
/archives//html/RFI/2009-02/msg00108.html (7,686 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated? (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:36:16 -0500
Well, I'm not going to watch a video, but here's a link to the FDA's page of information on CFLs: http://www.fda.gov/CDRH/radhealth/products/cfl.html " Do CFLs emit UV? All fluorescent lamps emit som
/archives//html/RFI/2009-02/msg00109.html (8,297 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated? (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:46:16 -0700
Some more than others. I use them around the house and can't say that I have noticed any difference. "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Fr
/archives//html/RFI/2009-02/msg00110.html (9,206 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy" <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:46:33 -0500
All fuoroescents generate UV; CFLs are no exception. The UV hitting the inside coating of the glass causes it to glow (fluoresce) with visible light; and that's how they generate light. The glass hop
/archives//html/RFI/2009-02/msg00111.html (8,691 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated? (score: 1)
Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:49:03 -0500
The claim of the researchers is 10x+ the UV radiation of a typical incandescent. I had trouble with the audio so could not make out a lot of the details. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E FS/Swap/Wanted: ht
/archives//html/RFI/2009-02/msg00113.html (9,316 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated? (score: 1)
Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:51:52 -0500
I was hoping for someone more qualified than me to evaluate the efficacy of the competing claims. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E FS/Swap/Wanted: http://kd4e.com/swapn.html Free OS : http://www.PuppyLinux
/archives//html/RFI/2009-02/msg00114.html (8,445 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated? (score: 1)
Author: w3kl@w3kl.com
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:09:08 -0800 (PST)
At the heart of all fluorescent bulbs (tubular, miniature, or CFL) is a low pressure mercury discharge.  When excited, a mercury discharge will emit copious amounts of UV energy at 254 nanometers (nm
/archives//html/RFI/2009-02/msg00115.html (12,235 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated? (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:53:45 -0500
Sure, I buy that. There's basically a vanishingly small amount of UV radiation in the thermal light distribution coming off an incandescent. Check out the Wikipedia graph of thermal emission spectra:
/archives//html/RFI/2009-02/msg00116.html (9,297 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated? (score: 1)
Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:01:10 -0500
Jeff, W3KI, shared some interesting perspective. Others have noted that we often may have a CFL in much closer proximity than a common florescent tube - so even if the CFL UV level is similar the con
/archives//html/RFI/2009-02/msg00117.html (11,425 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:42:50 -0500
If it's 10 the average incandescent it'd take some very sensitive equipment to even know it's there. IOW, just scare tactics. Even the big tubes close up give off very little. I have 22 8' tubes in m
/archives//html/RFI/2009-02/msg00118.html (9,402 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] CFL's & UV - Hoax or Real? Real but Overstated? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy" <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:40:30 -0500
That wouldn't surprise me. Incandescents emit light by way of what physicists call "blackbody radiation," which everything in the universe emits, proportional to its temperature above absolute zero.
/archives//html/RFI/2009-02/msg00124.html (10,017 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu