Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+CFL\s+Bulbs\s+that\s+are\s+OK\!\s+PLEASE\s+STOP\!\!\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+CFL\s+Bulbs\s+that\s+are\s+OK\!\s+PLEASE\s+STOP\!\!\!\!\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] CFL Bulbs that are OK! PLEASE STOP!!!! (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:44:30 -0800; Hey Guys, This is an RFI Reflector. It is not a chat room about light bulbs. The original post, and a few early replies, were on topic. The other 50 or so replies have been a waste of everyone's tim; /archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00040.html (10,545 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] CFL Bulbs that are OK! PLEASE STOP!!!! (score: 1): Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:30:35 -0500; Hi Jim, Is comparing notes about CFL's and their RFI effects somehow outside the realm of RFI? Is my asking about lists of comparison a waste of time? I was interested and still interested in the see; /archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00049.html (11,740 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] CFL Bulbs that are OK! PLEASE STOP!!!! (score: 1): Author: Andy <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:50:01 -0500; I like it! Does someone know of a good email discussion group that is only about CFLs? Or perhaps someone should start one. Then we could nudge (note I said nudge, not kick) people in that direction; /archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00051.html (10,538 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]