Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Chasing\s+RFI\s+on\s+6M\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Chasing\s+RFI\s+on\s+6M\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Chasing RFI on 6M (score: 1): Author: Jim Miller <jim@jtmiller.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:18:10 -0500; I have a 10db increase in noise on 6 meters to the east as compared to my west. This obviously isn't good when trying to work EU terrestrially or via EME at moonrise. I have already completed a full; /archives//html/RFI/2015-12/msg00078.html (7,233 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Chasing RFI on 6M (score: 1): Author: "Leigh Sedgwick" <bipi@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:00:35 -0800; Hi Jim, I use a National RF, Inc directional loop. http://www.nationalrf.com/noise_location.htm Mike K7PI I have a 10db increase in noise on 6 meters to the east as compared to my west. This obviousl; /archives//html/RFI/2015-12/msg00079.html (8,719 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Chasing RFI on 6M (score: 1): Author: "Leigh Sedgwick" <bipi@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:22:12 -0800; I should have added that I use this directional loop with a TECSUN PL-660 receiver and an Elecraft AT1 attenuator (0-40 dB attenuation). It has served me well. Good luck Mike K7PI Hi Jim, I use a Nat; /archives//html/RFI/2015-12/msg00080.html (9,082 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] Chasing RFI on 6M (score: 1): Author: "Christopher E. Brown" <cbrown@woods.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:07:26 -0900; I have a pair of Arrow Antenna fox hunt loops (the larger "VHF" (1 - 600Mhz) ones) along with their step attenuator. Have used 160 - 2 meters, switch to one of their short 70cm beams for 70cm. ______; /archives//html/RFI/2015-12/msg00081.html (9,033 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] Chasing RFI on 6M (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:09:01 -0800; Hi, I would recommend a loop, and use the null, not the peak... Much simpler to get your headings that way. See: http://nk7z.net/i-have-rfi-now-what-locating-it/ in that page, I covered how I did my; /archives//html/RFI/2015-12/msg00082.html (9,344 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] Chasing RFI on 6M (score: 1): Author: "Leigh Sedgwick" <bipi@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:51:20 -0800; Absolutely agree with David. Null is the way to go. A switchable attenuator is very handy as you get closer to the source. Remember that the null is broadside to the loop...max signal is off the ends; /archives//html/RFI/2015-12/msg00083.html (10,194 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] Chasing RFI on 6M (score: 1): Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:17:25 -0800; You already have direction, now use proximity. Using a less efficient antenna, or no antenna at all, you should be able to get within a few tens of feet of the source, close enough to see it, or the; /archives//html/RFI/2015-12/msg00084.html (7,384 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]