Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Chattam\s+\&\s+Wells\/Perfect\s+Fit\s+Industries\s+Electric\s+Blanket\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Chattam & Wells/Perfect Fit Industries Electric Blanket (score: 1)
Author: Alex <kr1st@amsat.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:26:35 -0500
...or why do sagas continue? I talked to my neighbors this past weekend and they told me that they were able to get a full refund from Penny's on the Perfect Fit Industries electric blanket. The call
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00091.html (9,040 bytes)

2. RE: [RFI] Chattam & Wells/Perfect Fit Industries Electric Blanket (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:38:09 -0500
Here an FCC document outlining the resolution of the Perfect Fit electric blanket saga. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-337A1.pdf Ed Hare, W1RFI ______________________________
/archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00030.html (6,611 bytes)

3. RE: [RFI] Chattam & Wells/Perfect Fit Industries Electric Blanket (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:47:15 -0800
Seven thousand dollars? That's less than the cost of printing new labels. Cortland blanket saga. _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00031.html (7,229 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] Chattam & Wells/Perfect Fit Industries Electric Blanket (score: 1)
Author: "Jim P" <jvpoll@dallas.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:53:05 -0600
I notice they are on "double secret probation" as well, having been required to appoint a compliance officer, having to 'stay clean' by the book/consent decree for the next three years as well as han
/archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00032.html (7,964 bytes)

5. RE: [RFI] Chattam & Wells/Perfect Fit Industries Electric Blanket (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:44:05 -0500
The reports I have back is that they will exchange them upon complaint. I can hear a couple of them on my way to work. The strongest one in my neighborhood is at 304 George Washington Tpke, and the o
/archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00033.html (10,444 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] Chattam & Wells/Perfect Fit Industries Electric Blanket (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:54:10 -0800
Too bad the FCC doesn't require ALL manufacturers to fix or replace equipment that causes interference to licensed services!!! This should have been part of the original Part 15 requirements! _______
/archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00034.html (9,598 bytes)

7. RE: [RFI] Chattam & Wells/Perfect Fit Industries Electric Blanket (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Martin" <mike@rfiservices.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:10:34 -0500
Hi everyone, Several years ago I was investigating an interference complaint and found the cause to be an electric blanket. At that time it was very common source of TVI/RFI. This one however was a l
/archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00035.html (9,133 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] Chattam & Wells/Perfect Fit Industries Electric Blanket (score: 1)
Author: Alex <kr1st@amsat.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:54:22 -0500
Jim P wrote: I wonder - what do they do with 'offending product' already in stores, in transit or in wharehouses - I don't recall at this point anything in the decree about offending product already
/archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00036.html (9,325 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] Chattam & Wells/Perfect Fit Industries Electric Blanket (score: 1)
Author: "Jim P" <jvpoll@dallas.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:27:52 -0600
Unrelated to the recent consent decree involving Perfect Fit Industries - opening excerpt from: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml03/03152.html - - - - - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 2, 2003 Rel
/archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00039.html (11,103 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] Chattam & Wells/Perfect Fit Industries Electric Blanket (score: 1)
Author: "Dick" <rbodine@cpinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:21:51 -0600
Correct me if I'm wrong but don't electric blanket mfr's emphatically state not to operate their devices when they're folded? Not saying this brand was not faulty but care has to be taken by the user
/archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00040.html (9,891 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] Chattam & Wells/Perfect Fit Industries Electric Blanket (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:06:55 -0800
Looks like they are now immune from FCC action on any of their presently non-compliant items. Smart lawyers! 7. In express reliance on the covenants and representations in this Consent Decree and to
/archives//html/RFI/2005-02/msg00057.html (8,869 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu