Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Choosing\s+Snap\-On\s+Toroid\s+for\s+6M\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Choosing\s+Snap\-On\s+Toroid\s+for\s+6M\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Choosing Snap-On Toroid for 6M? (score: 1): Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 23:03:34 -0500; Which of these snap-ons might be most likely to stop a problem I have with 6M getting into my LDG AT-100Pro autotuner, please? http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/category/235/Ferrites.html -- Than; /archives//html/RFI/2007-02/msg00046.html (6,916 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Choosing Snap-On Toroid for 6M? (score: 1): Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 10:26:26 -0500; Thanks guys! I will track down some Mix 31 and 33 and try both. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: h; /archives//html/RFI/2007-02/msg00047.html (8,606 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Choosing Snap-On Toroid for 6M? (score: 1): Author: "Morse, Earl (E.A.)" <emorse@ford.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:08:33 -0500; As folks have already noted, the material type is not mentioned in the data on that site. In most cases these snap on beads are in a #43 material which is used almost exclusively by the computer indu; /archives//html/RFI/2007-02/msg00054.html (8,589 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] Choosing Snap-On Toroid for 6M? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:48:37 -0800; Yes. If you study the data, the small air gap of the clamp-ons is mostly a factor at lower frequencies, but no big deal at higher frequencies. But the clamp-ons are about twice the cost for equivalen; /archives//html/RFI/2007-02/msg00055.html (9,051 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]