Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Computer\s+monitor\s+RFI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Computer\s+monitor\s+RFI\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Swilsonac6@aol.com (Swilsonac6@aol.com); Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 02:55:08 EST; << writelog@contesting.com, logwindows@qth.net, rfi@contesting.com, wf1b-rtty@wf1b.com >> Thanks for the helpful suggestions for the cause and cure of my monitor RFI problem. It appears the video car; /archives//html/RFI/2000-01/msg00021.html (7,390 bytes)
2. [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Swilsonac6@aol.com (Swilsonac6@aol.com); Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 02:19:02 EST; I just got a 19 inch Veiwsonic monitor to replace my 15 inch NEC multisync 4FGe that I have been using for the last few years. I get S5 - S8 noise every 75 - 77 KHz (this can be changed by changing t; /archives//html/RFI/1999-12/msg00042.html (8,309 bytes)
3. [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Jeff Singer" <js@reallybig.com (Jeff Singer); Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 12:16:48 -0500; I have NEVER had such a problem with any Sony monitor, currently using 19" model 400PS, and 17" 200E(S). 73 de Jeff K2KV -- Submissions: rfi@contesting.com Administrative requests: rfi-REQUEST@contes; /archives//html/RFI/1999-12/msg00043.html (9,730 bytes)
4. [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Ed - K0iL <k0il@mitec.net> (Ed - K0iL); Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 10:34:36 -0600; multisync every The only solution I've ever heard of is to buy a clean monitor to start with. The Viewsonics are RFI/EMI Junk! Return it or sell it. Before doing so however, try plugging it into anot; /archives//html/RFI/1999-12/msg00044.html (9,729 bytes)
5. [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Ernie" <ernie@avana.net (Ernie); Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 12:45:15 -0500; Guys, FWIW I am using an NEC MultiSync 70 monitor (17".) I find it to be very quiet. I had the same results with the C500 15" NEC monitor as well....my wife is now using that one in her office. If an; /archives//html/RFI/1999-12/msg00045.html (11,451 bytes)
6. [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Paul Hicks, VE3ZT" <ve3bbh@interlog.com (Paul Hicks, VE3ZT); Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:21:31 -0500; For starters, the next time I purchase a monitor, it would have the European "CE" designation. My 17" MAG monitor behaves similarly as yours does. I've tried RFIing the power cord and cord from the m; /archives//html/RFI/1999-12/msg00046.html (9,612 bytes)
7. [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: George K. Watson" <watson@epiloglaser.com (George K. Watson); Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 19:05:54 -0700; Before we all go off and yell three cheers for the "CE" designation, let us consider the fact that in the great bulk of cases, manufacturers self assign this designation after merely filing a report; /archives//html/RFI/1999-12/msg00047.html (8,266 bytes)
8. [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Jon Ogden <jono@enteract.com> (Jon Ogden); Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 23:47:10 -0600; One thing I did on my monitor that seemed to help was to actually ground the frame of the monitor to my RF ground. Helped out with noise to the radio and with RF getting into the monitor quite a bit.; /archives//html/RFI/1999-12/msg00050.html (8,374 bytes)
9. [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Alan Beagley <ab2os@att.net>; Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 14:06:46 -0400; The Sony 15" monitor connected to the computer I am using with my rig generates an enormous amount of RFI: S9 signals at intervals on 20m and up, the intervals depending on the screen resolution I se; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00075.html (7,129 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: dj2001@mn.rr.com; Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 13:51:48 -0500; The Sony 15" monitor connected to the computer I am using with my rig generates an enormous amount of RFI: S9 signals at intervals on 20m and up, the intervals depending on the screen resolution I se; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00077.html (7,466 bytes)
11. Re: [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 13:27:57 -0700 (PDT); Good luck. So much for the FCC's Part 15 radiation limits! As all of us around here know...they're nowhere near sufficient to prevent interference to HF users. Your first mistake was buying Sony. It'; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00078.html (8,665 bytes)
12. [RFI] Computer Monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Don Allen <w9cw@intergate.com>; Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 18:56:42 -0500; I use a KDS RAD-5 15" LCD monitor, and as is the case with most (if not all) LCD monitors, absolutely no RFI on any band. IMO . . . if you are serious about using a PC in your ham shack, the LCD flat; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00085.html (6,944 bytes)
13. RE: [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Berry W6EZ <serazin@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 17:33:10 -0700; If you have another computer, try the monitor on it before you make the conclusion that it is the monitor, I could very well be the video card. If the video is built into the motherboard it could sti; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00086.html (7,759 bytes)
14. Re: [RFI] Computer Monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 21:15:59 -0400; The Samsung Syncmaster 152N receives a weak review here: http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,111739,00.asp The KDS RAD-5 gets a similar weak review here: http://www.ascully.com/modules.php?n; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00087.html (9,221 bytes)
15. Re: [RFI] Computer Monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: BobK8IA@aol.com; Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 21:34:03 EDT; The gamers certainly have pushed the performance notch for video cards, monitors etc up the scale. I have 7 computers here and the Samsung 152N may or may not be the best in the place but it sure doe; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00088.html (10,014 bytes)
16. Re: [RFI] Computer Monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 21:40:12 -0400; I have had two -- one a MAG and my current generic Liquid Video (sold by Circuit City). Bith have been RF quiet but the MAG had a bit better video quality. The Liquid Video really has to be run at 1; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00089.html (8,486 bytes)
17. Re: [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 09:29:09 +0100; Alan Beagley wrote: The Sony 15" monitor connected to the computer I am using with my rig generates an enormous amount of RFI: S9 signals at intervals on 20m and up, the intervals depending on the sc; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00091.html (9,479 bytes)
18. [RFI] Computer Monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Don Allen <w9cw@intergate.com>; Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 09:07:57 -0500; doc wrote: The Samsung Syncmaster 152N receives a weak review here: http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,111739,00.asp The KDS RAD-5 gets a similar weak review here: http://www.ascully.com/mo; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00093.html (9,520 bytes)
19. Re: [RFI] Computer Monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 13:07:14 -0400; I'm using a Samsung 150S - no EMI (unless I bring a BC radio within <6" of it) and works fine for me/my needs though it may not be the best for steaming video/high refresh rates. Graphic arts needs m; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00094.html (11,431 bytes)
20. Re: [RFI] Computer monitor RFI (score: 1): Author: Alan Robinson <robinsah@engr.orst.edu>; Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 10:49:43 -0700; It seems that Sony monitors and TVs do produce a lot of RFI. I have a 20 inch Trinitron that is 4 or 5 years old. It produces an amazing amount of RFI from 30 feet away from my station. No amount of; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00095.html (7,886 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]