Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Corona\s+Noise\s+Profile\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Corona\s+Noise\s+Profile\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Corona Noise Profile? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:54:33 -0800; Why is it that noise blankers are effective against typical powerline noise, but not corona noise? Is it because typical powerline noise is periodic in nature and corona is random? __________________; /archives//html/RFI/2008-01/msg00006.html (6,313 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Corona Noise Profile? (score: 1): Author: "Jim P" <jvpoll@dallas.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:23:32 -0600; Kelly, I think you are pretty close to the answer. The noise blankers on the old GE (and Motorola) low-band VHF radios used a separate TRF (Tuned RF) receiver to amplify the 'noise' - and the last s; /archives//html/RFI/2008-01/msg00009.html (7,945 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]