Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Coupling\s+methods\s+for\s+RFI\s+emission\s+testing\s+on\s+SPS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Coupling\s+methods\s+for\s+RFI\s+emission\s+testing\s+on\s+SPS\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Coupling methods for RFI emission testing on SPS (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 12:46:25 +0800; There are a few applications where I have needed to use a SPS and worried about RFI. My solution has been to compare the powered and unpowered spectrum on a SA, looking for areas where the floor is r; /archives//html/RFI/2016-08/msg00051.html (9,969 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Coupling methods for RFI emission testing on SPS (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 23:02:43 -0700; Hi Jeff, I recently went through this getting a small Samlex inverter to be clean enough to power a logging laptop for mobile use in W6GJB's pickup, and trying to find a switcher quiet enough (or mak; /archives//html/RFI/2016-08/msg00052.html (11,251 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Coupling methods for RFI emission testing on SPS (score: 1): Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:27:32 -0600; Jeff, Your method sounds a bit too "Rube Goldberg" for me. Assuming the RF interference is via common mode current radiating from external wires (reasonable assumption) the FCC limits for a part B de; /archives//html/RFI/2016-08/msg00053.html (13,048 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]