Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Do\s+we\s+neglect\s+problems\s+and\s+fix\s+symptoms\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Do we neglect problems and fix symptoms? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:36:13 -0500
Some times the approach to fixing problems seems more like treating the common cold. IE fixing the symptoms instead of the problems. IF one station uses a piece of equipment with no problems, yet ano
/archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00164.html (8,314 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] Do we neglect problems and fix symptoms? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:18:09 -0800
My published advice on the topic of RFI is two important premises. First, is the assumption that with any commercial product, the best solution is generally one that does not require modification of
/archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00166.html (9,720 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] Do we neglect problems and fix symptoms? (score: 1)
Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:46:34 -0800
"Re: [RFI] Do we neglect problems and fix symptoms?" Yes. When a major electronics firm has spent six years and 500 million dollars to produce noisey crap, the chances of a shoe-string budget ham of
/archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00167.html (7,543 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] Do we neglect problems and fix symptoms? (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Svetanoff" <svetanoff@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:52:20 -0600
Jim, Roger, and All: Jim and Roger have made excellent points in their respectuve postings. I would just like to add my comments regarding overall RFI issues with commercial equipment: I have spent t
/archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00168.html (15,572 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] Do we neglect problems and fix symptoms? (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:57:01 -0500
I think the contention of the original poster was to "fix" the problem with our wallets - as in, return them, and tell them WHY - and say "Guess what, any product you make that has RFI problems will
/archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00172.html (8,700 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] Do we neglect problems and fix symptoms? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 16:37:55 -0800
Yes, that's an action I fully support, and have recommended more than once. The problem arises when RFI-free products of a given type are not available in the marketplace, or are specialized products
/archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00173.html (9,678 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] Do we neglect problems and fix symptoms? (score: 1)
Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:06:34 -0800
"and tell them WHY - and say "Guess what, any product you make that has RFI problems will be returned" " Having done this with many items over the past three decades and having worked in the electron
/archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00174.html (9,176 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] Do we neglect problems and fix symptoms? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 22:42:42 -0500
Experience would indicate it goes a lot lower in frequency than that. Oh, so may years ago I had set up with stations on each band. A good portion of the station was in a home made console. http://ww
/archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00175.html (19,989 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] Do we neglect problems and fix symptoms? (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:28:53 -0500
Definitely the way to go, if you can Interestingly, my ROUTER doesn't cause a lot of problems - the MOTHERBOARDS do - Putting ferrites on the router end does almost nothing, put them on the PC side,
/archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00193.html (10,473 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu