Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+EMC\s+active\s+loop\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+EMC\s+active\s+loop\s+antennas\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] EMC active loop antennas (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:02:44 -0500; Do any of you have experience with any particular active HF loop antennas calibrated for EMC measurements? If so, if you have any recommendations for an economical choice, please let me know on this; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00060.html (6,954 bytes)
2. RE: [RFI] EMC active loop antennas (score: 1): Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:28:42 -0800; At a former employer we used the EMCO 6502 with integral amplifier and rechargeable battery pack. It worked quite well. See http://www.emctest.com/productpage.cfm?model=6502&producttype=Antennas I do; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00063.html (9,015 bytes)
3. RE: [RFI] EMC active loop antennas (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:28:36 -0500; The FCC's assumption of free-space conditions is based on standard methodology. The methods in ANSI C63.4 are similar to those in CISPR-22, etc. Although the FCC rules are expressed in terms of elec; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00065.html (12,806 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]