Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Ethernet\s+RFI\s+Elimination\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Ethernet RFI Elimination? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Rosenberg <wd3q@starpower.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:02:27 -0500
I have a 3-computer/single printer wired network (using a Linksys router/print server) in my house. For a variety of reasons, I can't run a wireless network. Jim Brown, K9YC, posted an interesting it
/archives//html/RFI/2004-11/msg00064.html (6,847 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] Ethernet RFI Elimination? (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing <martin@aa6e.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:28:40 -0800 (PST)
There are spurs everywhere, if you look deeply enough, like every 32 kHz. See http://www.aa6e.net/aa6e/rfi/ether_details.html I have tried the following - -Used Cat5 shielded twisted pair -Wrapped 5
/archives//html/RFI/2004-11/msg00065.html (8,635 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] Ethernet RFI Elimination? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim" <jvpoll@dallas.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:25:46 -0600
How much of this is due to Ethernet activity alone, separate from the huge amounts of noise that the cheap switchmode power supplies emit? I have to keep my 3 yr old Linksys switch (not simply a 'hub
/archives//html/RFI/2004-11/msg00066.html (7,600 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] Ethernet RFI Elimination? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:37:14 -0600
Hi Eric -- sorry for the late response -- I've been on the road. 14,030, 21,052, and the bottom 20 kHz of 10 meters are some that I have identified. Shielded CAT5 is NOT necessary, and will probably
/archives//html/RFI/2004-12/msg00000.html (7,641 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] Ethernet RFI Elimination? (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:50:10 -0500 (EST)
I have a Linksys switch that creates +40dB hash on every band when it is powered on, even with no cables plugged into it. It's awful - I put it in the box and bought a Belkin 5 port switch and it wor
/archives//html/RFI/2004-12/msg00002.html (7,200 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] Ethernet RFI Elimination? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Rossi <kk1l@intergate.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:04:41 -0500
And to prove there are no constants in life...I have a Linksys wireless router/switch running at 100-base-T right in my shack with no issues whatsoever. I got it used and never had the Linksys power
/archives//html/RFI/2004-12/msg00003.html (8,387 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] Ethernet RFI Elimination? (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:25:37 -0500 (EST)
guess they figured out that it was a nuisance and modified the design. Mine's about 3 years old. 73 Jason N1SU _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http
/archives//html/RFI/2004-12/msg00004.html (9,392 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] Ethernet RFI Elimination? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim" <jvpoll@dallas.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:52:39 -0600
Is it 'the baby' or the bathwater? It it the switching power supply or the actual LAN 'switch' and 100-base-T RFI emission or EMI conduction? Practically, it doesn't matter, *unless* one wants to jus
/archives//html/RFI/2004-12/msg00005.html (8,244 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] Ethernet RFI Elimination? (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:04:47 -0500 (EST)
I tried different supplies, got the same noise so I gave up on the switch ;-) 73 Jason N1SU _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/RFI/2004-12/msg00006.html (7,502 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu