Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+FCC\s+posting\s+via\s+ARRL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+FCC\s+posting\s+via\s+ARRL\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] FCC posting via ARRL (score: 1): Author: "AA6DX - Mark" <aa6dx@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:11:48 -0800; Lots of "stuff" here...http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement_logs/2007/0216.html Mark Nelson - AA6DX mailto: AA6DX@ARRL.NET _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contest; /archives//html/RFI/2007-02/msg00057.html (6,190 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] FCC posting via ARRL (score: 1): Author: Dave NØRQ <n0rq-lists@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:26:59 -0600; Yes, lots of "stuff", including the 3rd letter to my local utility (last letter on that page). Though the RFI resolution is by no means fast, at least they try to make it work. (I'm still holding my; /archives//html/RFI/2007-02/msg00058.html (7,363 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] FCC posting via ARRL (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:43:40 -0500; The plus side of all this is that ARRL has Mike Gruber, W1MG, who works on these RFI issues full time. Information on the ARRL's power-line noise process is found at http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/rfi-; /archives//html/RFI/2007-03/msg00005.html (9,768 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]