Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+FW\:\s+ARLB022\s+FCC\'s\s+OET\s+Clarifies\s+Emissions\s+Compliance\s+Testing\s+for\s+RF\s+LED\s+Lighting\s+Devices\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+FW\:\s+ARLB022\s+FCC\'s\s+OET\s+Clarifies\s+Emissions\s+Compliance\s+Testing\s+for\s+RF\s+LED\s+Lighting\s+Devices\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] FW: ARLB022 FCC's OET Clarifies Emissions Compliance Testing for RF LED Lighting Devices (score: 1): Author: D C _Mac_ Macdonald <k2gkk@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:49:34 -0500; I'd guess it's a start, at least! * * * * * * * * * * * * 73 - Mac, K2GKK/5 * * (Since 30 Nov 53) * * Oklahoma City, OK * * USAF, Ret'd 61-81 * ** FAA, Ret'd 94-10 * * * * * * * * * * * * ___________; /archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00104.html (12,205 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] FW: ARLB022 FCC's OET Clarifies Emissions Compliance Testing for RF LED Lighting Devices (score: 1): Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:07:53 -0700; I predict no change other than a run on Part 15 labels which the products have always had. Adding an "a" or a "b" to the report before manufacturing is unlikely to mean anything except the maufactur; /archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00105.html (8,771 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] FW: ARLB022 FCC's OET Clarifies Emissions Compliance Testing for RF LED Lighting Devices (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 02:59:05 -0400; I'm located on the centerline for 06 and just inside the FAF for the GPS 06 approach. I'm far enough out, I could get away with about 190 feet which is more than I could afford anyway. I sometimes he; /archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00006.html (9,494 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] FW: ARLB022 FCC's OET Clarifies Emissions Compliance Testing for RF LED Lighting Devices (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 03:57:00 -0400; Kurt, your mention " If something was to change, what about the millions of RFI generating devices that already exist and are causing the current problems?" reminds me of the lousy signal (IM product; /archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00007.html (12,212 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] FW: ARLB022 FCC's OET Clarifies Emissions Compliance Testing for RF LED Lighting Devices (score: 1): Author: JW via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 13:37:09 +0000 (UTC); Comment below. From: Roger (K8RI) <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com> To: rfi@contesting.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 2:57 AM Subject: Re: [RFI] FW: ARLB022 FCC's OET Clarifies Emissions Compliance Testing; /archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00010.html (8,814 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]