Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+FW\:\s+Interference\s+on\s+TV\s+using\s+2\s+meters\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] FW: Interference on TV using 2 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Charles AF4O" <af4o@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:38:58 -0500
This reminds me of a situation that happened to me many years ago, probably about the late 1980's. A neighbor about 2 blocks away complained to the catv company that he was getting interference on ch
/archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00054.html (8,043 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] FW: Interference on TV using 2 meters (score: 1)
Author: Fred Stevens K2FRD <k2frd@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:53:17 -0700
Chuck, very good story and good work! Hams are constantly blamed for any type of interference by neighbors' who are having electronic entertainment problems. I'm frequently catching heat (albeit frie
/archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00055.html (10,099 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] FW: Interference on TV using 2 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Tim" <jake@dingoz.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:33:41 -0600
Hi All, I've got to get in on this one. I'm a former Cable employee. I have about 20 years cable experience and about the same in satellite dishes. KJ7AZ is my callsign. First story, There was a ham
/archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00056.html (13,266 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] FW: Interference on TV using 2 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:55:18 -0700
While I certainly don't condone intentional QRM, when the cable system chose to convert TV to VHF frequencies allocated to other users, it assumed the responsibility for preventing QRM to and from li
/archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00057.html (8,146 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] FW: Interference on TV using 2 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:22:16 -0500
I agree the Ham should not have been using 300 watts to access something 1/2 mile away, but the problem with TVI was 100% the cable operator's creation. When a licensed over-the-air service operatin
/archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00060.html (9,442 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] FW: Interference on TV using 2 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Morse, Earl (E.A.)" <emorse@ford.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:47:50 -0500
It's amazing that the city was still making any money on the service. If the general public knew you could get it for free why would you bother to pay for it? At $35 a month that would be over $400 a
/archives//html/RFI/2006-10/msg00061.html (7,820 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu