- 1. [RFI] FW: More info on 2 mtr long range phones (score: 1)
- Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J)
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:24:13 -0500
- Here's what I tried to send earlier. I want to repeat something that N7LT says at the end: Please remember, DON'T attack these businesses! It only makes them mad, and then they work harder to hide wh
- /archives//html/RFI/2001-05/msg00044.html (35,600 bytes)
- 2. [RFI] FW: More info on 2 mtr long range phones (score: 1)
- Author: Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI)
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 17:34:26 -0400
- Hi, Guys, I agree with Ed; let's get this properly to the FCC. I was in the process of doing just that through Chris Imlay, but unfortunately, in all this hoopla, they have changed their web pages so
- /archives//html/RFI/2001-05/msg00045.html (41,948 bytes)
- 3. [RFI] FW: More info on 2 mtr long range phones (score: 1)
- Author: Gerry Maira <gm@netsync.net> (Gerry Maira)
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 19:52:21 -0400
- Here's another one on ebay. This one obviously can transmit on 145 Mhz. The same model might show up again with different frequencies - or no frequencies - listed. I wonder how much control the user
- /archives//html/RFI/2001-05/msg00046.html (7,576 bytes)
- 4. [RFI] FW: More info on 2 mtr long range phones (score: 1)
- Author: Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI)
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 18:22:40 -0400
- Nope, sorry; the unit has expired or been withdrawn. Maybe one of these times, I will actually be able to buy one of these and send it to the FCC before all the publicity causes the seller to lay low
- /archives//html/RFI/2001-05/msg00047.html (8,921 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu