Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Filing\s+Comments\s+to\s+FCC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Filing\s+Comments\s+to\s+FCC\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Filing Comments to FCC (score: 1): Author: wx5l at charter.net (WX5L); Date: Thu Aug 7 07:02:14 2003; Hello, Although I filed my comments to the FCC about BPL several weeks ago the deadline has been extended untill August 20th. I inadvertently deleted the process and ID number to file. Could someone; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00018.html (7,171 bytes)
2. [RFI] Filing Comments to FCC (score: 1): Author: n4zr at contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu Aug 7 08:15:33 2003; The current filing period is for "reply comments" only. You can probably couch your comments as such and get them in -- just be sure to reference one of the power company comments that say "Interfere; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00019.html (7,851 bytes)
3. [RFI] Filing Comments to FCC (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr at aol.com (Jimk8mr@aol.com); Date: Thu Aug 7 14:37:36 2003; Look for comments on behalf of the "United Power Line Council", filed July 7. I couldn't get these from the FCC's site, but the copy of the filing at the UPLC web site http://www.uplc.utc.org/file_de; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00028.html (7,565 bytes)
4. [RFI] Filing Comments to FCC (score: 1): Author: eedwards at oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Thu Aug 7 16:00:48 2003; --Original Message-- From: Jimk8mr@aol.com at page 9, includes a real whopper: "The UPLC is pleased to respond that there has been no interference reported in any of the field trials by its members."; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00031.html (6,968 bytes)
5. [RFI] Filing Comments to FCC (score: 1): Author: W4EF at dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Thu Aug 7 17:27:54 2003; You stole my thunder, Jim. Equally troubling is UPLC's assertion in the same comments that BPL is "last mile solution that doesn't require large head-ends or central offices". Of course they never ge; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00032.html (8,727 bytes)
6. [RFI] Filing Comments to FCC (score: 1): Author: jimsmith at shaw.ca (Jim Smith); Date: Fri Aug 8 16:56:38 2003; I doubt that the presence or absence of hams would have made any difference. It is the UPLC members who have not reported interference. This is not the same as reporting that there was no interferenc; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00035.html (8,222 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]