Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Formal\s+RFI\s+complaint\s+to\s+the\s+FCC\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "Van Fair" <vfair@innova.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:55:57 -0500
I have a sony 40 " tv which transmits a strong signal on 14 to 15 MHZ. There is no way to filter it out. I can pick it up on a battery operted rcvr. 200 plus feet away at S7 or more. On my pro 11 it
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00007.html (6,590 bytes)

2. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:34:43 -0800
Van, Its Part 15, actually. What model is it? Copies of the data may be searchable on the FCC's Web site at http://www.fcc.gov/oet/fccid/ under its FCC ID number. For Amateur Radio related complaints
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00008.html (9,130 bytes)

3. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 22:03:57 -0500
The TV won't be in the database. As an unintentional emitter and not a computer or computer peripheral, it is subject only to the verification requirements in Part 15. This means only that the manufa
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00010.html (13,444 bytes)

4. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 21:24:09 -0800 (PST)
One of the things people are always told in regards to RFI/TVI is to "keep your own home clean". I've tried for almost a year to eliminate the TVI my TV receives on 40 and 80 meters with as little as
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00013.html (9,118 bytes)

5. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 8:18:59 -0800
I believe that the presence of harmful interference outside a residence (in this case apparently 200 feet away - and to WWV) makes it possible for the FCC to act -- and for Riley Hollingsworth to app
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00016.html (8,970 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:35:50 -0500
I'm a little busy now to take on extra work, but I'd sure like to see people get started on these plasma TV's. I think it is major trouble in the brewing. It could be wind up being worse than BPL. 73
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00017.html (7,598 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:58:03 -0500 (EST)
I firmly agree. Take an HT with an HF receiver to Best Buy or Sears sometime. Really nasty. regards, Jason W0JSB _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00018.html (8,075 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: n0tt1@juno.com
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:00:03 +0000
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 21:24:09 -0800 (PST) "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws> writes: In my view, that's 100% correct. One could openly carry a small portable radio into a store to check before buying a pro
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00019.html (8,546 bytes)

9. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: John Rollins <kd7bcy@teleport.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:45:19 -0800
To make matters worse, even if I wanted to replace the tv I wouldn't know what TV to buy since all tv's are "legal" although some are less susceptible to TVI than others. How do you know in advance?
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00020.html (8,289 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: STRutledge@aol.com
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 18:06:46 EST
You might have a long wait on this one. The FCC has a long list of issues to deal with. Leaky CATV systems come to mind. In my 20 plus years with a USG agency that operated a public safety radio syst
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00021.html (7,995 bytes)

11. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:29:47 -0500
73, Ed Hare, W1RFI ARRL Lab 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0318 Internet: w1rfi@arrl.org Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis ARRL is the National Association for Amateur Radio. It is supporte
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00022.html (10,175 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 21:15:16 -0800
That's good news, Ed. It means that the RFI isn't necessarily inherent in the technology like it is with BPL. Plasma displays seem to be here to stay, so its nice to know that you can actually build
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00023.html (8,725 bytes)

13. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 17:00:17 -0500
Well, it MAY be good news. So far, we haven't had a chance to confirm it one way or the other. I've been kinda' busy with BPL stuff. :-) Tom Frenaye told me today of a newer flat-screen technology th
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00025.html (10,259 bytes)

14. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:29:44 -0800 (PST)
And what technology might that be? I'm curious. I'm sure I'm not the only one around here looking for a quiet replacement for my 10 year old CRT. _______________________________________________ RFI m
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00028.html (8,616 bytes)

15. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:32:48 -0500
to be And what technology might that be? I'm curious. I'm sure I'm not the only one around here looking for a quiet replacement for my 10 year old CRT. TFT seems to be clean in my ham shack -- I'm on
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00029.html (9,271 bytes)

16. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jimbrown.enteract@rcn.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:48:15 -0600
No, you are not the only one. I may need to buy a new set in the next few weeks, and I've got plasma on my mind! Jim Brown K9YC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@co
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00030.html (8,320 bytes)

17. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 08:27:20 -0500
I have not done extensive testing but have had no obvious problems with the Samsung DLP model we bought a few months ago. Digital Light Processing uses some interesting technology from Texas Instrume
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00031.html (8,917 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu