Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Galaxy\s+Grow\s+Light\s+Ballast\s+Update\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:46:47 -0600
W0IVJ's recent post to this reflector coincidently provided links to products I was in the process of installing here. I promised an update after I had a chance to try these products in the field. Se
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00000.html (10,112 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:52:05 -0600
What is it about certain reflectors that totally destroys formatting of the original note, regardless of whether they are sent in HTML or plain text? These paragraphs left here nice and neat and arri
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00001.html (10,946 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: dalej <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:58:36 -0600
That's what I did with a neighbor across the street and heated water dish for a dog. It cost me $50 but I got the noise maker in my garage now and plan to dissect it and take a couple pictures. Since
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00002.html (7,962 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 05:07:48 -0800
Not on my email client, looked great here...  Set your wrap to 72 or greater. -- 73's, and thanks, Dave For software/hardware reviews see: http://www.nk7z.net For MixW support see: https://groups.yah
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00003.html (8,415 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 05:08:36 -0800
Larry, Thank you so much for this information.  I will suggest our local grow suppliers use these lights... -- 73's, and thanks, Dave For software/hardware reviews see: http://www.nk7z.net For MixW s
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00004.html (13,015 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:08:26 +0000
I have seen filters for both the load and lamp side, so you may need to try both. I had thought it was on the Hydrofarm site, but I don't see the load and lamp filters listed. I think I ordered some,
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00005.html (15,612 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:14:57 -0600
This is the input/output filter you may be thinking of: http://growershouse.com/nanolux-rf-filter-set-reduce-rf-interference At this point I don't think my neighbor wants to do any additional experim
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00006.html (16,244 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:38:22 -0800
Hi Ed, In my experience, conventional filters on the line side are less effective (often ineffective) if the mechanism is common mode. Remember that the definition of common mode for us is very diffe
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00008.html (9,374 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:46:28 -0700
Hi Jim, My experience has been similar to yours. When I was developing my ballast filter, I not only found that the filtering was more effective on the lamp side, but I could gain another 10 dB by no
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00009.html (10,003 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:52 -0800
While I understand your intent, I don't agree with your execution. The problem is one of safety. The purpose of the Green wire in electrical systems is to blow a fuse or breaker in the event of a fau
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00010.html (11,371 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:19:07 -0700
Jim, I respectfully disagree. The choke in the green wire and the common mode choke both are 300uH. A short circuit current between the hot and the green wire would pass through both chokes in series
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00011.html (12,581 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:51:21 -0800
It will be very interesting to see the results of your tests Ed...  You guys do good work, thanks for your efforts in all of this... -- 73's, and thanks, Dave For software/hardware reviews see: http:
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00012.html (18,506 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:58:08 -0800
On Mon,2/1/2016 1:19 PM, Tom Thompson wrote: I respectfully disagree. The choke in the green wire and the common mode choke both are 300uH. A short circuit current between the hot and the green wire
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00013.html (9,622 bytes)

14. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:13:35 -0500
I respectfully disagree. GFI isn't intended to prevent a shock: it's intended to prevent death by electrocution. I suspect they do that admirably even with 600 uH total inductance split over two legs
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00014.html (10,903 bytes)

15. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:49:53 -0700
Jim, This choke is on the *Lamp *side of the ballast, not on the *Line *side, so it is unclear what a short circuit among any of the wires on the Lamp side will do. It largely depends on the ballast
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00015.html (10,238 bytes)

16. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: "Donald W. Kane via RFI" <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:50:53 -0500
Just a point of information...a fuse or circuit breaker will NOT and is not intended to prevent electrical shock. Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter protection will! Fuses, breakers and other OCPD's ar
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00016.html (10,174 bytes)

17. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 21:42:41 -0800
That is WRONG. Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter protection will! GFCI's protect against a very different mechanism, namely leakage current. GFCI's sample current in the phase (hot) and neutral conduc
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00017.html (9,834 bytes)

18. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 21:48:26 +0000
A GFCI will protect against a shock that would result from the hot wire conducting current to the ground conductor or external ground, but it will not protect against a shock from the hot to the neut
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00018.html (9,908 bytes)

19. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:55:13 -0700
I did an LTSpice simulation of switching 120 volts through a 600 uH inductor into an 8 ohm load. The inductor delays 30 amps of current through the load by 600 microseconds and 15 amps by 200 microse
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00021.html (11,353 bytes)

20. Re: [RFI] Galaxy Grow Light Ballast Update (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 18:26:54 +0000
Yes, that's it, and I do have a set on order. If any of you have a cooperative neighbor, let me know and we can get you to try the filters. If they work, you can keep them. Most growers have more tha
/archives//html/RFI/2016-02/msg00025.html (18,433 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu