Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+HDTV\:\s+Plasma\s+vs\s+LCD\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:44:13 -0800 (PST)
I've read many reports if severe RFI from plasma TVs. It's about time for us to upgrade form our old NTSC Sony to something better. The plasma screens seem to be less expensive for a given picture qu
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00076.html (7,222 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:54:06 -0500
We chose a 50" LG - LCD w/LED backlight - it is RFI quiet. Your challenge with any device may be aging components rather than only the initial performance. Some plasma's are reportely RFI-quiet while
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00077.html (8,144 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:57:17 -0500
On 12/20/12 05:44 pm, Kimberly Elmore wrote: I've read many reports if severe RFI from plasma TVs. It's about time for us to upgrade form our old NTSC Sony to something better. The plasma screens see
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00078.html (7,996 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:59:25 -0800
In general, most plasmas generate bad RFI (that cannot be corrected) and most LCDs do not. I've never seen a report of a problematic Sony LCD, and I like my 3 year old XBR. At least one of the major
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00079.html (7,945 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: dalej <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:14:55 -0600
If it were me, I'd go with a quality LCD with LED backlighting, ( think most new LCD's now have LED backlight). I have a small one here in the shack, mounted on the wall, it is a Samsung with LED bac
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00080.html (8,417 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:14:32 -0600
Samsung. Dave Harmon K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net Sperry, Ok. In general, most plasmas generate bad RFI (that cannot be corrected) and most LCDs do not. I've never seen a report of a problematic Sony L
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00081.html (8,113 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: Richard Battles <wb4byq@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:04:02 -0600
What ever you do, do not, do not, do not buy a plasma tv of any kind. I moved to the county of 5 acres to get away from a Samsung 50 inch plasma within 30 feet of my house, a plasma down the block, o
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00082.html (9,264 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh" <bipi@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:44:06 -0800
Completely agree. Next door neighbors have a large plasma inside their family room about 75 feet from my shack and more than 125 feet from the antenna. I can watch them turn it on and instantly I hav
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00084.html (10,838 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:52:12 -0500
Is it possible that a wireless alarm system might generate RFI in the VHF range? I am chasing a signal mixing with the FM-BC band. I have to check but I believe it is a 2.4gHz wireless. We chose a 50
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00085.html (8,127 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:10:47 -0800
Regardless of who you operate and where, point your beam at their TV until they dispose of it. Kurt _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00086.html (8,249 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:09:31 -0500
I concur. There may be a few quiet ones, but unless you have reports from several sources all indicating the same model TV to be one of those, I would stay clear of them. Or at least make sure you ca
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00089.html (10,238 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:13:08 -0500
Regardless of who you operate and where, point your beam at their TV until they dispose of it. If anyone knows of cases where that actually worked, I'm not aware of it. My worst plasma TV produces S7
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00090.html (8,662 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:31:09 -0500
On 12/20/12 05:44 pm, Kimberly Elmore wrote: I've read many reports if severe RFI from plasma TVs. It's about time for us to upgrade form our old NTSC Sony to something better. The plasma screens see
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00092.html (8,536 bytes)

14. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:34:21 +0000
I've only been successful getting rid of nearby touch lamps using that method. 73, de ed -K0iL If anyone knows of cases where that actually worked, I'm not aware of it. My worst plasma TV produces S7
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00095.html (10,146 bytes)

15. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:49:43 -0500
I wasn't going to pursue this but you know that curiosity thing ... I am guessing that each device will have a unique spectrum vulnerability, and that may not be the same frequency at which it is ill
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00097.html (10,016 bytes)

16. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:23:34 -0800
I should repeat my reminder that, in today's world, nearly all instances of RFI to consumer equipment is caused by Pin One Problems, NOT by conventional differential coupling into radio circuits. So
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00098.html (9,515 bytes)

17. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:10:02 -0800
Speaking of which, I just picked up a Yeasu FT-60 with a NEW charging system for a local OM who doesn't have a credit card for phone orders. It destoys all potential of operating from "DC-Daylight",
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00101.html (8,608 bytes)

18. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:06:40 -0800
New Yaesu FT-60R HT with matching new Yaesu VAC-370B Desktop Rapid Charger. All new, all factory, all "Yaesu". The SMPSU (switching mode power supply unit) is different from the ones my wife and I o
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00104.html (8,358 bytes)

19. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Svetanoff" <svetanoff@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 23:50:34 -0600
Kurt, The charger for the FT60 is not a unique situation. I purchased an Icom AD-91A HT earler this year - its receiver covers AM b'cast band thru 1 GHz or so. The Icom charger (rig was bought new, i
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00105.html (10,450 bytes)

20. Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:57:41 -0600
Thanks to all that took time to respond! I made my choice and it wasn't plasma! A 47" 1080p LCD/LED Panasonic. It should prove a big step up from our current Sony CRT NTSC unit. 73 & MX, Kim N5OP ___
/archives//html/RFI/2012-12/msg00113.html (8,392 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu