Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Local\s+Noise\s+Environment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Local\s+Noise\s+Environment\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Local noise environment (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 08:56:50 -0500; A bunch of responses, that I thought would be worth summarizing briefly. Nobody thought that this sort of interference *level* (S9+10) is to be expected. Several people put the noise on waterfall dis; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00254.html (9,458 bytes)
2. [RFI] Local Noise Environment (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:13:20 -0500; I am trying to figure out my local noise environment and understand what (if anything) I can do to correct it. On my shunt-fed tower, in daytime, the S-meter on my Mark V (which is extremely generous; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00242.html (7,353 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]