Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Low\s+voltage\s+lighting\s+solid\s+state\s+\"transformers\"\s+$long\,somewhat\s+OT$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Low\s+voltage\s+lighting\s+solid\s+state\s+\"transformers\"\s+$long\,somewhat\s+OT$\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] Low voltage lighting solid state "transformers" (long,somewhat OT) (score: 1): Author: Tim Groat <tcgroat@mesanetworks.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:49:34 -0700; Not quite! They are *recognized components*, but that is not the same as a Listed finished product. Note the backwards "RU" (USA) and "cRU" (Canada) approval logos in the photo <http://www.hrelamppa; /archives//html/RFI/2006-12/msg00059.html (9,930 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Low voltage lighting solid state "transformers" (long,somewhat OT) (score: 1): Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:21:50 -0500; An acute observation, and thanks, too for diving into the UL site. "Factory assembled", eh? The thot plickens! Cortland KA5S (long,somewhat OT) a <http://www.hrelampparts.com/files/Cat/HRE/Ballast_Tr; /archives//html/RFI/2006-12/msg00061.html (11,604 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Low voltage lighting solid state "transformers" (long,somewhat OT) (score: 1): Author: "Steven Farmer" <wa5rpf@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:46:02 -0700; Indeed. The "quiet" RT60A units purchased at the local electrical supply house also have the backwards "RU" logo. And like the noisy units, they don't have any FCC id on them. The complete text on t; /archives//html/RFI/2006-12/msg00062.html (8,249 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] Low voltage lighting solid state "transformers" (long,somewhat OT) (score: 1): Author: "Steven Farmer" <wa5rpf@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:29:20 -0700; I received the following from Mike Gruber at ARRL HQ and received his permission to re-post it here. -- Steve, The rules regarding this sort of thing can be a bit confusing. Any device that generates; /archives//html/RFI/2006-12/msg00063.html (8,937 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] Low voltage lighting solid state "transformers" (long,somewhat OT) (score: 1): Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:19:58 -0500; Well. as already noted, for small items you may not get a label. It is possible to have Part 15 information an instruction sheet, for example. I will add also that for Verification, there wil be no F; /archives//html/RFI/2006-12/msg00064.html (10,264 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] Low voltage lighting solid state "transformers" (long,somewhat OT) (score: 1): Author: "Steven Farmer" <wa5rpf@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:12:43 -0700; Hi Cortland, The items in question have neither an FCC id nor any indication that verification has been done. They don't say anything about it one way or the other. Also, there are no instructions. T; /archives//html/RFI/2006-12/msg00065.html (11,967 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]