Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+MFJ\-856\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+MFJ\-856\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] MFJ-856 (score: 1): Author: Patrick Dyer <pjdyer@swbell.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:01:57 -0600; Is this MFJ-856 worth a second glance for DFing RFI ? For that part of the spectrum I'm currently (since 2003) using the R, DE, D1, and D2 of an 11-el 144-MHz Cushcraft with an Icom IC-A4 (108-137 MH; /archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00054.html (6,781 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] MFJ-856 (score: 1): Author: "Dave Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:13:11 -0500; I have both the MFJ units....with and without the yagi....they work well Dave Harmon K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net Sperry, Ok. Is this MFJ-856 worth a second glance for DFing RFI ? For that part of the; /archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00055.html (7,692 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] MFJ-856 (score: 1): Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:52:42 -0700; where noise is relatively everywhere, it is useless. Readings are the same pointing at a source, the ground or the sky when tracking down power line noise. The unit we used is now on a shelf, the pa; /archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00056.html (7,029 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] MFJ-856 (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:38:18 -0400; OTOH, for less money, you can buy a shirt-pocket handi with 2-band transmit capability and AM receive capability on the aircraft band. I built a 136-mhz moxon (from QST} out of hardware store aluminu; /archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00058.html (9,348 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] MFJ-856 (score: 1): Author: "Dale Svetanoff" <svetanoff@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:26:48 -0500; Pete and All, I recently purchased an Icom IC-91A, a 2m/70cm dual bander, and it has air (and even SW band) AM capability. I plan to use it as Pete describes the next time I have a power line-related; /archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00059.html (12,235 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] MFJ-856 (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:40:45 -0400; I thought about mentioning that at the time I wrote my last message. I included a simple variable attenuator - no need for calibrated attenuation - so that I could reduce the signal enough to get a g; /archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00060.html (13,298 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] MFJ-856 (score: 1): Author: Missouri Guy <n0tt1@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:37:51 +0000; Well, I have to check in on this.... I have the MFJ 852, the RFI RX with the "dipole. The RX, I'll bet is the same as the newer 856. The 852, was worthless with just the dipole. Otherwise it's a simp; /archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00061.html (8,680 bytes)
8. Re: [RFI] MFJ-856 (score: 1): Author: "Dave Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:02:55 -0500; The 852 rx is the same unit as the 856. The only difference is the antenna. I completely disagree that the dipole unit is 'worthless'. I have both units and each have some advantages. It's easy to df; /archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00062.html (10,473 bytes)
9. Re: [RFI] MFJ-856 (score: 1): Author: "Dale Svetanoff" <svetanoff@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:47:45 -0500; Dave and Charlie, Well, you guys appear to be agreeing to disagree, at least insofar as use (or not) of an attenuator goes. Question: Has either of you ever put either MFJ unit onto a sig gen and mea; /archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00063.html (13,690 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] MFJ-856 (score: 1): Author: "Dave Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:53:15 -0500; Hi Dale..... I don't have a sig generator that goes high enough...about 144mhz...so I can't test it. All I know is that I can find what I am looking for when I use it. I use a pair of earbuds as well; /archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00064.html (13,715 bytes)
11. Re: [RFI] MFJ-856 (score: 1): Author: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:00:38 -0700; Hi all, I just got home from Visalia and noticed this email. I have an MFJ 852 and IMHO it is one one the only pieces of MFJ that really works. That being said, I have come up to poles where the RFI; /archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00065.html (15,082 bytes)
12. Re: [RFI] MFJ-856 (score: 1): Author: "Dave Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:29:36 -0500; That's right....I forgot to mention that. Dave Harmon K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net Sperry, Ok. Hi all, I just got home from Visalia and noticed this email. I have an MFJ 852 and IMHO it is one one the; /archives//html/RFI/2012-04/msg00066.html (15,551 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]