- 1. [RFI] OT: RE: solar problems (score: 1)
- Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 05:46:29 -0400
- If it's a deliberate phase bobble, that's a clever way for power co's avoid having to pay people for their solar power. Cortland --Original Message-- From: rfi-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rfi-boun
- /archives//html/RFI/2011-04/msg00021.html (7,783 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RFI] OT: RE: solar problems (score: 1)
- Author: K8RI <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:43:52 -0400
- They need to control phase, but there is no need for them to shut the inverter down in the line power is shut off. The inverter system should have a transfer switch and immediately drop the connectio
- /archives//html/RFI/2011-04/msg00022.html (9,494 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RFI] OT: RE: solar problems (score: 1)
- Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:10:41 +0000
- The pricey high power whole house inverters and battery banks that need maintenance, ventilation, and periodic replacement are the reasons the microinverters are starting to catch on. While they do n
- /archives//html/RFI/2011-04/msg00023.html (13,136 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RFI] OT: RE: solar problems (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:26:43 -0500
- You're not up-to-date on the latest in the solar industry. Most grid-tied systems these days have no batteries (because they reduce system efficiency). The system generates power while the sun is up,
- /archives//html/RFI/2011-04/msg00024.html (8,254 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RFI] OT: RE: solar problems (score: 1)
- Author: K8RI <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 01:32:27 -0400
- That would not be in the power companies best interests. Those things cause them all kinds of headaches and "book work" yes I am. That's why I complain. They have taken the most complex and least use
- /archives//html/RFI/2011-04/msg00026.html (11,338 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu