Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Plasma\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Plasma\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Plasma (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki <n6pe@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:43:40 -0800 (PST); There is an AMAZING difference in Plasma and LCDs TVs regarding total power drawn and idle current. A large plasma might draw less than a small LCD. This is just one spot to check http://reviews.cnet; /archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00098.html (10,133 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Plasma (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:47:44 -0800; That's not the way I read this spreadsheet. Indeed, if you sort on watts/sq inch, most of the plasma sets are grouped toward the bottom of the chart (least efficient) and most of the LCDs are grouped; /archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00099.html (7,682 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Plasma (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:30:42 -0500; You might want to check that page again. With only a few exceptions, for a given screen size the Plasmas draw about twice the power of the LCDs and the overall ratings of the Plasmas were poor while; /archives//html/RFI/2008-12/msg00100.html (11,947 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]