Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Question\s+from\s+CO8LY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Question\s+from\s+CO8LY\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] Question from CO8LY (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:33:01 -0700; The Drake filter is excellent. I could run 1500W on 10 meters and watch channel 2 on 54-60 MHz with zero QRM using a TV antenna spaced less than 1 meter away from my 10m Yagi. The Channel 2 transmitt; /archives//html/RFI/2010-03/msg00089.html (7,586 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Question from CO8LY (score: 1): Author: "Richard D. Reese" <wa8dbw@neo.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:11:07 -0400; I have used them since the 160s and still have two of them. They are rated at 1000 watts and designed to attenuate above 32 MHz. I have tested them at 1500 watts and find they work great with no heat; /archives//html/RFI/2010-03/msg00090.html (9,093 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Question from CO8LY (score: 1): Author: "Richard D. Reese" <wa8dbw@neo.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:20:17 -0400; Should read - used them since the 1960s!!! I guess I have fumble fingers. 73 Rich WA8DBW -- Original Message -- From: "Richard D. Reese" <wa8dbw@neo.rr.com> To: "Eduardo Somoano C" <co8ly@frcscu.cige; /archives//html/RFI/2010-03/msg00091.html (10,043 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]