Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+RFI\/TVI\,\s+max\.\s+permissible\s+electrical\s+field\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+RFI\/TVI\,\s+max\.\s+permissible\s+electrical\s+field\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] RFI/TVI, max. permissible electrical field (score: 1): Author: Cedric Baechler HB9HFN <cedric.baechler@com.mcnet.ch> (Cedric Baechler HB9HFN); Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 17:53:18 +0000; Hello, Recently I learned from the neighboor that I was doing TVI/RFI on some of his electrical devices. He then called the OFCOM (like FCC in USA) that made electrical fields measures and found valu; /archives//html/RFI/1999-01/msg00001.html (7,273 bytes)
2. [RFI] RFI/TVI, max. permissible electrical field (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 12:55:54 -0600; [KØiL] Hi Cedric, Sorry to hear abt ur problem. A quick review of USA's FCC regulations (97.307 & 97.313) shows a limitation only on spurious (non-fundamental) signals. There is of course a p; /archives//html/RFI/1999-01/msg00002.html (9,753 bytes)
3. [RFI] RFI/TVI, max. permissible electrical field (score: 1): Author: Blackburn" <blackburn@qnet.com (Blackburn); Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 19:29:16 -0800; Hi, Just though I'd add a little more information. K0IL is correct that the U.S. does not regulate transmitted fields from amateur stations in terms of generating susceptibility to consumer electroni; /archives//html/RFI/1999-01/msg00005.html (13,364 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]