Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+RFI\s+Dimmers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+RFI\s+Dimmers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] RFI Dimmers (score: 1): Author: <ve3yv@pathcom.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:24:16 -0500; I have both Luton and Leviton dimmers for LED lights. Both appear to be RF quiet - IOW they don't appear to contribute to a high downtown rowhouse noise level using roof mounted antennas. FWIW - I le; /archives//html/RFI/2019-02/msg00036.html (7,903 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] RFI Dimmers (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:57:32 -0800; This is an example of why reports that product X is quiet are next to useless when the reporter is in a sea of noise obscures the noise that it might produce. A device is RF quiet if it doesn't raise; /archives//html/RFI/2019-02/msg00037.html (7,213 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] RFI Dimmers (score: 1): Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:10:57 -0500; A few years ago I tested both a Luton and Leviton LED dimmer with 120 VAC dimmble LED recessed lighting, and both generated RFI but in different portions of the MF and HF spectrum (very different beh; /archives//html/RFI/2019-02/msg00038.html (8,353 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] RFI Dimmers (score: 1): Author: "John K9UWA" <john@johnjeanantiqueradio.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:51:22 -0500; I might add here that over the last 3 years I have look at lots of LED bulbs relative to RFI generation. There are the good the Bad and the VERY ugly when it comes to LED bulbs of all configurations.; /archives//html/RFI/2019-02/msg00039.html (8,481 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]