Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+RFI\s+Susceptibility\s+of\s+DTV\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+RFI\s+Susceptibility\s+of\s+DTV\?\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:32:45 -0800; Can anyone point me to engineering references that discuss the relative susceptibility to RFI of DTV as compared to analog TV? That is, is DTV more or less susceptible to interference, or about the s; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00158.html (6,565 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:33:14 -0600; Form a non-engineer point of view, that's what I'd expect. The interference would raise the bit error rate but you wouldn't notice at all until you get to the point where it can't decode, then it's g; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00159.html (7,657 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa@latt.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:55:26 +0000; Haven't seen any engineering references yet, but, Given the reduced power of ATSC, nearly all of the permanent ATSC channel assignments are at the high end of the VHF allocation, not the low end. Eve; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00160.html (7,660 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:59:03 -0500; Try this a starting point. "Interference Rejection Thresholds of Consumer Digital Television Receivers Available in 2005 and 2006." FCC/OET 07-TR-1003 <http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/D; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00161.html (8,156 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:15:02 -0500; Wow, in technology that's old, 2005-2006. I have observed significant performance differences between two different models of 2008 converters - some of it is hardware and some firmware - it may not b; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00162.html (8,649 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:23:09 -0600; A friend that lives in Chicagoland bought a big Sony plasma TeeVee really early on. Paid about 1.6 Icom 7800s for it. The Chicago CBS affiliate transmits NTSC on channel 2 but their ATSC feed is on .; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00163.html (8,005 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: dgsvetan@rockwellcollins.com; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:19:48 -0600; Jim, I do not have any specific "reference" documents to which I can point you, but you may be interested in two anecdotal experiments I have performed at my QTH. 1. The ice dispenser in my refrigera; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00164.html (13,010 bytes)
8. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:24:51 -0500; Relating what I've seen over the past few years from one location. I've included all of the set up as each installation/location is going to be different. I have a Samsung 40", 1080i capable LCD set; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00165.html (11,866 bytes)
9. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Andy" <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:08:27 -0500; Is the reduced power permanent? Or is this just during the interim period when both ATSC and NTSC are in use? (I thought the temporary DTV assignments were at lower power.) The lower VHF channels ar; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00166.html (8,505 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:32:54 -0500; There's a lot of channel switching around, but I think you'll find the low VHF including channel 2 will still be widely used and are not going away. They certainly are not being reassigned to other s; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00167.html (11,462 bytes)
11. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:14:51 -0500; I can't agree with this. Here in the central Adirondacks of upstate NY, during a sunspot minimum I get very useable analog pictures from Syracuse, Utica, and Watertown on channels 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, and; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00168.html (11,156 bytes)
12. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:18:33 -0800; That's in conflict with what I'm seeing. One piece of info that came to me in response to my initial question was a report showing DTV to be quite susceptible to interference from impulse noise and d; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00169.html (11,005 bytes)
13. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Andy" <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:29:53 -0500; Recently I scanned a listing of old/new channel assignments, and almost all the VHF-low channels (2-6) were being vacated. It wasn't a thorough check, but I saw very few staying down there. This was; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00170.html (10,377 bytes)
14. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:14:21 -0500; So you don't bother with a VHF beam for OTA-TV, only UHF? We are in the fringe area for Tampa and I need to replace my combo VHF/UHF beam. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E FS/Swap/Wanted: http://kd4e.com/s; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00171.html (9,990 bytes)
15. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Howard Lester" <hlester@dakotacom.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:38:45 -0700; Go to www.antennaweb.org Click on Choose an Antenna Enter your zipcode and uncheck the two boxes. Enter your address (or your neighbor's) to get more specific, if necessary. Answer the two questions; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00172.html (9,663 bytes)
16. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:41:13 -0600; My DTV experience has been quite poor. First of all I subscribe to a "wireless cable" service (no worries there), but my father lives in a rural part of Kansas. With an antenna at 45 feet and a mast; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00173.html (14,185 bytes)
17. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:54:58 -0600; The answer is "it depends" our local channel 3 is running digital on channel 2. They will go back to 3 at the transition. www.antennaweb.org is very useful indeed. Your mileage may vary. 73, Joe --Or; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00174.html (10,130 bytes)
18. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:47:01 -0500; The World Above 50 MHz column in this month's QST (February) QST has a table listing the VHF-low DTV stations, post-transition. There will be a total of 38; channel 5 is most popular with 13 stations; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00175.html (9,911 bytes)
19. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:12:19 -0800; Depends on what you call useful. antennaweb got my address right on a map, and told me there were NO signals at my QTH. My local TV comes from two sites, one 42 miles away and the other 45 miles, onl; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00176.html (11,136 bytes)
20. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Andy" <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:17:37 -0500; How come? Storm damage? Not getting adequate DTV reception? _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00177.html (9,427 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]