Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+RFI\s+Susceptibility\s+of\s+DTV\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+RFI\s+Susceptibility\s+of\s+DTV\?\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: Patrick Dyer <pjdyer@swbell.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:28:08 -0600; This site can also provide some useful TV coverage predictions http://tvfool.com/ 73, Pat - WA5IYX _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00178.html (7,780 bytes)
22. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:44:47 -0500; It was already a used beam when I put it up at about 35 feet, after a couple of years of Florida weather and big crows several elements are flapping in the breeze - it's not as though they are built; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00179.html (10,679 bytes)
23. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:45:30 -0500; Been there, the data was good for my QTH. -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E FS/Swap/Wanted: http://kd4e.com/swapn.html Free OS : http://www.PuppyLinux.com Personal: http://kd4e.com /\ {| / \ {| / \ {| / @ \; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00180.html (10,209 bytes)
24. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:33:01 -0500; Sorry, this one got a little long. That is more likely do to several other items. One is the channels are not the same. IF you have a digital TV set it will show the digital version of channel 7 as 7; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00181.html (19,682 bytes)
25. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:16:34 -0500; Oh, I absolutely agree, Roger. My analog Channel 2 in Utica is moving to Digital on Channel 29, I think it is. So we immediately have a path loss difference, even if ERP and antenna location are the; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00182.html (12,304 bytes)
26. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:51:44 -0500; They were hoping to divert a bunch of the dollars from the spectrum sales to other purposes - so they deliberately underfunded the coupons. Congress and the FCC have known for at least 6 months but d; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00183.html (11,777 bytes)
27. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:48:36 EST; In all this it may be good to consider how cable TV got started. CATV - that's not CAble TV, but Community Antennna TV - started in places where residents couldn't get TV off the air because they wer; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00186.html (10,809 bytes)
28. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:58:42 -0500; Likewise I agree. Most TV "users" are like most computer "users". Completely clueless and don't care. OTOH Like the cars we drive they shouldn't have to be experts, but at least care enough to check; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00187.html (13,446 bytes)
29. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: Tim Long <tlong8@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:32:31 -0500; Hello All, Politics aside (please), the original answer to the original question is that over-the-air DTV is less susceptible to RFI. AND, if the digital stream gets corrupted, the TV display goes bl; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00188.html (9,952 bytes)
30. Re: [RFI] RFI Susceptibility of DTV? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:55:03 -0600; Some are, though: http://icanhascheezburger.com/2009/01/20/funny-pictures-have-thxbi/ -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! No Trillion-dollar blank check for crooks! ___________; /archives//html/RFI/2009-01/msg00197.html (9,171 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 30
Page: [1] [2]