Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+RFI\s+from\s+LED\s+Snap\-In\s+Modules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+RFI\s+from\s+LED\s+Snap\-In\s+Modules\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] RFI from LED Snap-In Modules (score: 1): Author: Jim McCook <JimW6YA@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 03:16:55 +0000; New construction in California does not allow screw-in sockets for ceiling lighting, so the usual case is to place cans that receive snap-in LED units with self contained switching power supplies. I; /archives//html/RFI/2018-11/msg00055.html (7,736 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] RFI from LED Snap-In Modules (score: 1): Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 16:26:53 +0000; I've run into a disgusting fact over my years as an EMC/RFI engineer: the lighting industry, in general, is unaware of FCC rules addressing radiated and conducted emissions from lighting. If we attem; /archives//html/RFI/2018-11/msg00064.html (9,262 bytes)
3. [RFI] RFI from LED Snap-In Modules (score: 1): Author: Jim McCook <JimW6YA@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 16:49:57 +0000; Dave.... I often wonder if it's unawareness or complete disregard. In any case, the FCC seems unconcerned. In CA the biggest problem is the Energy Commission that makes the rules, completely unawar; /archives//html/RFI/2018-11/msg00065.html (7,343 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] RFI from LED Snap-In Modules (score: 1): Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 18:51:39 +0000; In general, the average guy on the street believes FCC has all to do with radio and television, licensing intentional radiators (like us amateurs), and managing the RF spectrum (although, that last i; /archives//html/RFI/2018-11/msg00067.html (9,821 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]