Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+RFI\s+to\s+new\s+photoelectric\s+smoke\s+detector\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 19:23:25 -0800
My inlaws just bought us a couple of new photoelectric smoke+fire detectors. They are both 9v battery powered First Alert model SA710CN. They are sensitive to RFI when I run 1KW. I did not have RFI w
/archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00014.html (7,010 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Svetanoff" <svetanoff@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:45:13 -0600
Kelly, While I do not have info for you on RFI-proof smoke/fire detectors, I can tell you that at least 1, and possibly more than 1, semiconductor device is getting forward biased by your RF. Your op
/archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00015.html (9,245 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:44:30 -0800
I tried multiple bands and multiple beam headings today, in addition to trying 80m. I couldn't make the smoke detector "chirp" today. I have no idea why. I assume it won't happen again until the next
/archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00016.html (10,605 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1)
Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:47:45 -0500
What else did you have hooked up uniquely for the contest? Something that was connected then, and not now, was coupling the signal into the detector wiring. I tried multiple bands and multiple beam h
/archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00017.html (7,822 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:28:36 -0800
Nothing was different AFAIK. The only difference I can think of is that I removed the battery (during the contest) and put it back in today. Oh well. It will probably come back at which point I can d
/archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00018.html (8,436 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 07:28:23 -0500
Were weather conditions different during the contest? I had severe problems with RF from 160m knocking my DSL connection off-line until I installed a filter. Now it is fine except when it rains. The
/archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00019.html (9,184 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1)
Author: roncasa <roncasa@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 07:59:46 -0500
Why? There is a small opening to detect smoke. Simply shielding the remaining unit certainly doesn't void any "warranty". It may or may not be the solution but certainly a try. I never heard of this
/archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00020.html (8,099 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:47:44 -0700
I had the same problem with several CO detectors. I finally found a brand that did not have the problem from Kidde. The model number is KN-COB-B but it is a CO detector not a smoke detector. Tom W0IV
/archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00021.html (8,969 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Svetanoff" <svetanoff@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:33:27 -0600
Ron, Since the quotation was from my posting, I'll answer the question. First, in most cases these days, merely opening up the housing of the detector is likely to void the warranty. (Replacing the b
/archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00022.html (10,171 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1)
Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:58:24 -0800
Then shield the exterior... Sounds like a job for aluminum foil, scotch tape and a hole punch. Kurt _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00023.html (7,894 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1)
Author: roncasa <roncasa@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:59:26 -0500
Since the quotation was from my posting, I'll answer the question. First, in most cases these days, merely opening up the housing of the detector is likely to void the warranty. (Replacing the batter
/archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00024.html (8,634 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu