Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Re\:\s+Final\s+Re\s+about\s+smell\s+tests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Re\:\s+Final\s+Re\s+about\s+smell\s+tests\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Re: Final Re about smell tests (score: 1): Author: Tim Groat <tcgroat@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:55:42 -0600; Eddie, I'm curious if you measured the "noise pulses" with a quasi-peak receiver or spectrum analyzer. That is what the FCC specifies for Part 15 devices at HF. The QP detector has a fast-attack, slo; /archives//html/RFI/2004-10/msg00125.html (7,149 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Re: Final Re about smell tests (score: 1): Author: Eddie Edwards <eedwards@tconl.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:02:26 -0500 (CDT); Hi Tim, First, let me say that I was only an observer to all testing. I neither selected any of the test equipment nor took any readings myself. I am not part of the utility's BPL project team. I'm j; /archives//html/RFI/2004-10/msg00126.html (8,579 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]