- 1. [RFI] San Diego BPL (score: 1)
- Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:39:18 -0600
- "...The SDG&E staffers said they were unimpressed by early BPL equipment, but were encouraged by a December visit to the Cinergy BPL system in Cincinnati--said to pass some 50,000 homes reportedly w
- /archives//html/RFI/2005-03/msg00000.html (6,507 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RFI] San Diego BPL (score: 1)
- Author: digital-conjurers@adelphia.net
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:59:33 -0800
- As a Ham, a SWL, and a San Diego County resident, I can only say that the whole idea of rolling out BPL here is questionable, considering the far-better wireless alternatives that are becoming more c
- /archives//html/RFI/2005-03/msg00001.html (9,600 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RFI] San Diego BPL (score: 1)
- Author: digital-conjurers@adelphia.net
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:45:23 -0800
- Dale, Good point. I think (this is pure speculation) that since SW broadcasting to the developed world has become less and less an interest of the public at large, the International SW broadcasting c
- /archives//html/RFI/2005-03/msg00002.html (8,494 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RFI] San Diego BPL (score: 1)
- Author: "n6ki@juno.com" <n6ki@juno.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 05:52:00 GMT
- Uh....guys.. You are missing the whole point...! SDG&E ( and I am sure many other power comapnaies considering BPL )could care less about using BPL to sell Internet access. SDG&E and others wants BPL
- /archives//html/RFI/2005-03/msg00003.html (8,470 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RFI] San Diego BPL (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim P" <jvpoll@dallas.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:27:54 -0600
- "SDG&E and others wants BPL for reading your meters automatically without human intervention and to monitor their power systems, transformers etc" This could actually work; these kinds of comms aren'
- /archives//html/RFI/2005-03/msg00004.html (9,953 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu