Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Smart\s+meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Smart\s+meters\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RFI] Smart meters (score: 1): Author: Howard Lester <howard220@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:54:16 -0500; Just shield the fixtures and point the lights *straight down* (not up!) where the light does the most good. That not only saves money because you can use lower wattage bulbs to achieve the same light; /archives//html/RFI/2012-01/msg00050.html (9,270 bytes)
22. Re: [RFI] Smart meters (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:47:13 +0000; Jim, Based on your message I'm sure you already know this. Factors that affect electric system load (base or peak)--in no particular order: 1. Building new power plants (or not building in some cases; /archives//html/RFI/2012-01/msg00051.html (11,333 bytes)
23. Re: [RFI] Smart meters (score: 1): Author: "David C. Hallam" <dhallam@knology.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:02:14 -0500; What I don't understand is why electric utilities can charge me to build a nuclear power plant long before they start construction. Don't get me wrong. I believe we should have more nuclear power pla; /archives//html/RFI/2012-01/msg00052.html (13,885 bytes)
24. Re: [RFI] Smart meters (score: 1): Author: Sam Morgan <k5oai.sam@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:10:32 -0600; IMO, they probably need that up front monies, so they can pay off the lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians they have to deal with to navigate the 3G's mine field, consisting of, the Greenies, the Gove; /archives//html/RFI/2012-01/msg00053.html (11,660 bytes)
25. Re: [RFI] Smart meters (score: 1): Author: roncasa <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:50:17 -0500; so, what you are saying is less regulations/government. that sounds so mitt romney even if "the good ol days" are still with us, power companies will continue their ways. Remember Enron. 72 Ron,wb1hg; /archives//html/RFI/2012-01/msg00054.html (9,520 bytes)
26. Re: [RFI] Smart meters (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:51:23 -0500; Hi David, I really & truly wonder what the good people of your State might have to say if your power authority did what ours here did (and continues to do)...? Specifically, the province of Ontario b; /archives//html/RFI/2012-01/msg00055.html (10,287 bytes)
27. Re: [RFI] Smart meters (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:16:15 -0600; I learn a lot from this list. I've learned that CFLs are evil for various reasons, often because they have tiny amounts of mercury or because their color temp is not exactly equal to that of Edison b; /archives//html/RFI/2012-01/msg00056.html (10,105 bytes)
28. Re: [RFI] Smart meters (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:21:02 -0500; Hi Peter, You are one lucky man, bar none... But do you REALLY need to gloat about it like that...?! : >) ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ ** On 2012-01-17, at 1:16 PM, Peter Laws wrote: _________________; /archives//html/RFI/2012-01/msg00057.html (10,921 bytes)
29. Re: [RFI] Smart meters (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:42:00 -0500; Can we, maybe, please, start talking about RFI again? 73, Pete N4ZR The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net; /archives//html/RFI/2012-01/msg00059.html (11,472 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]