Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Smoke\s+and\s+CO\s+alarms\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Smoke\s+and\s+CO\s+alarms\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: "Rick D" <n6pe@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:27:03 -0700; Chasing VK9WWI this morning I fired up the Alpha 78 on 80 meters. Woke the dogs and XYL setting off my First Alert BATTERY operated smoke and CO alarms. Any known cure short of QRP or QRT ? Thanks, R; /archives//html/RFI/2007-09/msg00032.html (6,995 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:44:37 -0700; smoke and CO alarms. You could always just remove the batteries. :) Seriously though -- are they completely stand alone, or are they wired into anything? If wired, try a capacitor on the order of 0.0; /archives//html/RFI/2007-09/msg00033.html (7,366 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: "Missouri Guy, N0TT" <n0tt1@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:43:53 +0000; Rick, I don't know your antenna layout there, but it sounds like you have some "RF-in-the-shack" problems. Assuming that your station grounding is adequate, try changing the length of feedline to you; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00000.html (7,028 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: MAXXOUT2@aol.com; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 18:45:56 EDT; smoke and CO alarms. ** See what's new at http://www.aol.com _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00001.html (6,443 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:38:03 -0400; Assuming it is battery operated and has no wires attached.....most important is the antenna. How far away? What type? What type feedline? Does it have a good balun? 73 Tom __________________________; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00002.html (7,352 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: MAXXOUT2@aol.com; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:55:18 EDT; Cover it with tin foil. Also it may be mounted right over top of a metal furring strip. You never did say what or how things go when running 100 watts. BOB AF2Q In a message dated 10/1/2007 7:36:51 P; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00003.html (6,841 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: Hardy Landskov <n7rt@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:47; I have the same problem. I could not fix the alarms so I took out the batteries. (They even went off with 100 watts). If there are smoke alarms out there that don't go off around RF please let me kno; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00004.html (9,341 bytes)
8. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:44:32 -0500; i did that about 1 am.... two years ago,,,,, set off the hard wired system, with the panel screaming and the Central OFFICE CALLING TO SEE IF I WAS ON FIRE,,,,, I even had the headphones on , but hea; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00005.html (7,186 bytes)
9. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: MAXXOUT2@aol.com; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:59:44 EDT; I live in a HUD complex and run an indoor MAG LOOP and at times run a full 100 watts. We have the battery operated First Alert CO-2 detector. The smoke detector is hard wired but this building has se; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00006.html (8,125 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: Ed Richardson <ed_richardson@shaw.ca>; Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:19:43 -0500; I was plagued by a similar problem, setting off the hardwired, monitored smoke alarm when operating on 80m and 15m. Too solve the problem, I had to follow a couple steps. First attempt was to install; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00007.html (8,702 bytes)
11. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:13:00 -0500; I CHANGED OUT THE DETECTORS TO : The ESL 449/448 Series self-diagnostic, four-wire smoke detectors continually monitor their own sensitivity and operational status,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, This series is e; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00008.html (8,000 bytes)
12. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: dgsvetan@rockwellcollins.com; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:54:59 -0500; This has become an interesting thread. One common issue becomes apparent when reading about the various problems encountered: too much RF close to the detectors. It is good to know that at least some; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00009.html (12,013 bytes)
13. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:39:47 -0700; 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00010.html (7,933 bytes)
14. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: Ed Richardson <ed_richardson@shaw.ca>; Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:38:55 -0500; In my case, the antennas were mounted on the roof of our 1 story bungalow. The affected detectors were immediatly below the vertical and the balanced doublet antenna. Separation was 12 feet vertical; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00011.html (9,738 bytes)
15. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:54:18 -0700; Demand a refund? Good luck! I took a walkway light transformer back to Home Depot a few years ago because it generated terrible RFI and they refused to take it back since I no longer had the receipt.; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00012.html (9,015 bytes)
16. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: "WA3GIN" <wa3gin@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 18:02:28 -0400; Here in VA both Lowels and Home Depot will accept any return for any reason without a receipt. They can look up your any of your recent charges in seconds to verify your purchase. It takes just a few; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00013.html (10,292 bytes)
17. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:51:05 -0500; I think the "look up" at the store level is only good for 30 days. But, ours here also takes most anything back with or without a receipt. 73, Jim -- Original Message -- From: "WA3GIN" <wa3gin@comcas; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00014.html (8,999 bytes)
18. Re: [RFI] Smoke and CO alarms (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:04:34 -0500; Costco is fabulous about returns Gary KA1J _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi; /archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00019.html (8,753 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]