Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Solar\s+Panel\s+RFI\s+Update\s+10\/31\/16\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Solar\s+Panel\s+RFI\s+Update\s+10\/31\/16\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Solar Panel RFI Update 10/31/16 (score: 1): Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:33:38 -0400; All: No word from Solar City regarding the Solar Panel RFI interference case I filed with them on August 8th of this year. I've been in touch with their representatives periodically who say that they; /archives//html/RFI/2016-10/msg00040.html (7,131 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Solar Panel RFI Update 10/31/16 (score: 1): Author: Gary Smith via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:37:43 -0700; I would suggest that you file your complaint with the FCC just in case there is a "too late to file" date. Ninety day after your complaint, and you're getting the "we're still looking into it" brush; /archives//html/RFI/2016-11/msg00000.html (8,454 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Solar Panel RFI Update 10/31/16 (score: 1): Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:09:52 -0400; Gary: I would suggest that you file your complaint with the FCC just in case there is a "too late to file" date. I phoned the FCC today and they assured me that there are no time limits when filing a; /archives//html/RFI/2016-11/msg00002.html (10,153 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] Solar Panel RFI Update 10/31/16 (score: 1): Author: Gary Smith via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:41:49 -0700; Hi Tony. Tnx for the info on no filing date for a complaint. Seems as if the FCC is getting to be more on the side of the consume rather than that of the manufacturer. 3's Gary...wa6fgi On 11/1/2016; /archives//html/RFI/2016-11/msg00004.html (11,052 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]