All: I received an update from Tesla's Ashley Holmen today. She once again said that Tesla and SolarEdge agree that they are not liable for interference caused by their solar panel systems. However,
"She once again said that Tesla and SolarEdge agree that they are not liable for interference caused by their solar panel systems." When the applicable CFR is quoted, and their requirement to comply,
They are not the OPERATOR, they are the MFR, and the Rules hold the OPERATOR responsible. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists
"They are not the OPERATOR, they are the MFR, and the Rules hold the OPERATOR responsible." I see now... Talking to those that aren't responsible, and asking those that can't enforce, to talk to thos
That pretty much sums it up. We have to learn to live with interference or move. Sad but true. Dale, K9VUJ "They are not the OPERATOR, they are the MFR, and the Rules hold the OPERATOR responsible."
Tony, I did have a discussion with Ashley Holmen of Tesla, however the testing you mention is not quite correct. I asked for a typical optimizer to do some testing with here at the lab, but she is no
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J via RFI" <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 16:06:44 +0000
Jim's statement was perfectly clear in caps. But I can't make heads or tails from the response. The previous statement's from Ed at ARRL Labs also indicate that solar vendors are initially working wi
"Jim's statement was perfectly clear in caps." Indeed. "But I can't make heads or tails from the response." I'll break it down... "Talking to those that aren't responsible" The manufacturer, to whom