Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+TAC\s+Noise\s+Floor\s+Inquiry\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+TAC\s+Noise\s+Floor\s+Inquiry\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] TAC Noise Floor Inquiry (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:12:20 -0600; Hi Everyone, I just checked the FCC web site to see the responses to the TAC Noise Floor Inquiry. So far there have only been 10 responses and the filing date closes August 11. I would encourage all; /archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00022.html (8,158 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] TAC Noise Floor Inquiry (score: 1): Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:47:10 -0700; Tom, Is it wise to use your response, and make changes, leaving some of what you already have in place, as my response? Using your response as a template so to speak. -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7; /archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00023.html (7,483 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] TAC Noise Floor Inquiry (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:55:42 -0500; Tom, I endorse participation in the ecfs comment system but it is my perception that the TAC is looking for accurate measurement data taken in units they understand and not "The noise level at my pla; /archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00024.html (7,259 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] TAC Noise Floor Inquiry (score: 1): Author: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:39:49 -0600; Hi Rob, I think you are correct in what the TAC is looking for, but some of the questions are aimed at a methodology for studying the problem. Only a few questions are aimed at technical studies on t; /archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00025.html (8,607 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] TAC Noise Floor Inquiry (score: 1): Author: PY2ZX <py2zx.ham@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 20:35:25 -0300; Hello all, On the FCC website there is a video recoded of the TAC meeting when is presented the proposition. It´s on 146:00 and goes till 158:00. https://www.fcc.gov/news-events/events/2016/06/techno; /archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00026.html (7,095 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] TAC Noise Floor Inquiry (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 20:29:31 -0500; Okay Tom FB. I hope ARRL gets hams to act in a way similar to other initiatives. But it is important to note that this isn't only about ham radio. TAC wants input from all users of spectrum. I'm sure; /archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00027.html (8,295 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] TAC Noise Floor Inquiry (score: 1): Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 21:30:16 -0700; I tried several computers/browsers/connections with no joy. I got a slow loading and bloated page that didn't recognise input. One way to not worry about results is to ensure it can't be used! Kurt _; /archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00028.html (7,415 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]