Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Topband\:\s+Another\s+source\s+of\s+160\s+meter\s+RFI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Topband\:\s+Another\s+source\s+of\s+160\s+meter\s+RFI\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] Topband: Another source of 160 meter RFI (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:36:45 -0400 (EDT); Before we get too euphoric about the FCC's performance in this matter, this is the text of an email sent to me today by the ham directly affected by this RFI: "So this is the third letter, and a visi; /archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00037.html (9,253 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Topband: Another source of 160 meter RFI (score: 1): Author: "Mike Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:48:39 -0400; I have two words for you.... WIRE CUTTERS. - m --Original Message-- From: donovanf@starpower.net Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 7:36 PM To: topband ; rfi Cc: W2PM Subject: Re: [RFI] Topband: Another; /archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00038.html (9,644 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Topband: Another source of 160 meter RFI (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:08:28 -0700; You noticed that as well... :) I was wondering how long it would take for someone to comment about the time frame here... -- Thanks, Dave For Amateur Radio equipment reviews and setups see: http://ww; /archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00040.html (10,176 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]