Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Topband\:\s+Tecsun\s+660\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Topband\:\s+Tecsun\s+660\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] Topband: Tecsun 660 (score: 1): Author: Michael C Martin <mike@rfiservices.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:53:00 -0500; If Stan's friend is that lucky he should attend the casino with me. Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com Hi Stan, There are countless thousands of poles within five miles of my QTH; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00086.html (12,352 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Topband: Tecsun 660 (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 21:19:47 +0000; I can't imagine this reliably working well. If noise gets onto long, overhead power lines, it will radiate for a long distance. The noise radiated by lines closer to the shack than the actual source; /archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00106.html (16,033 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Topband: Tecsun 660 (score: 1): Author: "Frank N. Haas KB4T" <utility.rfi.pro@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:35:56 -0500; As a utility RFI Investigator, I am always polite when speaking with complainants. However, I typically ignore any specific pole references they provide. In my experience this information is 99% wron; /archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00107.html (7,846 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]