Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+U\-Verse\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+U\-Verse\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] U-verse (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki <n6pe@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:28:12 -0700 (PDT); I had it here for a few weeks and had to go back to DSl. They worked all their tricks and I hung tons of donuts and we couldn't get 160 and 500 watts to play. Problem is losing the modem you not only; /archives//html/RFI/2010-10/msg00081.html (8,512 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] U-verse (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:34:33 -0700; Ferrites are useless on the lower HF bands unless you wind a LOT of turns through them. For 160M, I would START with at least 24 turns on anything connected to a phone line, DSL or even POTS, and I w; /archives//html/RFI/2010-10/msg00082.html (7,011 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] U-verse (score: 1): Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:14:15 -0400; With all the problems from the phone line. Since we're on this subject - I'd heard of all of those things multiple times. So it's not like no one was getting any credit. My own take on the matter is; /archives//html/RFI/2010-10/msg00086.html (8,449 bytes)
4. [RFI] U-Verse (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki <n6pe@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:35:06 -0700 (PDT); About two years ago I tried U-Verse with TV and blew it away, went back to DSL. Got new U-Verse with phone and internet only so I don't screw up the XYLs soaps. It is perfectly clean with full KW 16; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00006.html (6,732 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] U-Verse (score: 1): Author: Patrick <wa4tuk-rf@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:29:35 -0400; Rick: Have the U-verse folks changed something that you can identify as different? Different wiring to the house, for instance. Did you originally have interference from U-verse or just a problem wit; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00016.html (8,094 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] U-Verse (score: 1): Author: "w2ttt@att.net" <w2ttt@att.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:44:59 -0400; Pat, Just curious if you have U-Verse as well? Rick, I am curious about your configuration before and now. If you would like, please give me a call as the ARRL EMC Committee has some experience that; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00021.html (9,246 bytes)
7. [RFI] U-Verse (score: 1): Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:13:27 -0500; I'm thinking of upgrading my DSL to U-Verse (internet only, no TV or phone). Can anyone offer any thoughts on AT&T's current hardware with regards to RFI produced and susceptibility to RF from a lega; /archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00086.html (6,705 bytes)
8. Re: [RFI] U-Verse (score: 1): Author: Gary Smith via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 09:44:20 -0700; I have dealt with AT&T re DSL and U-Verse only to receive a different level of unsatisfaction. Against my own better wishes, I went with Comcast. To this date, as of 3 years ago, it has been bulletpr; /archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00092.html (8,121 bytes)
9. Re: [RFI] U-Verse (score: 1): Author: jimk8mr--- via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:35:20 -0400; I've had uVerse, TV/phone/internet, for several years. RF on 20 meters had been quite bad at freezing things up. A month or two back, due to some on demand video issues, AT&T replaced the old equipme; /archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00095.html (9,064 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] U-Verse (score: 1): Author: "David Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:06:58 -0500; I have DISH TV, ATT cellphone service, internet is provided with the cellphone personal hotspot. No cables, no wires, no modems, no RFI in either direction. Totally portable...I use a laptop and a bi; /archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00096.html (10,080 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]