Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Utility\s+coming\s+tomorrow\s+to\s+chase\s+RFI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Utility\s+coming\s+tomorrow\s+to\s+chase\s+RFI\s*$/: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RFI] Utility coming tomorrow to chase RFI (score: 1): Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 19:15:25 -0400; Tom, Oh wait! It only does AM-rx 108-137? "1.5 猩 TYP for 10 dB SN (108-137 MHz, AM)" Can the VX-3R be modded to open up AM-rx through UHF? Or is AM only on HF (OK re. 3uV HF) and 108-137 sufficient; /archives//html/RFI/2014-06/msg00058.html (11,105 bytes)
42. Re: [RFI] Utility coming tomorrow to chase RFI (score: 1): Author: jimk8mr--- via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 20:22:17 -0400 (EDT); I use the VX3-R with AM through 903. Not sure I've ever heard any signals on 903, but it works well on 2m and 432, with AM. I suspect the specs listed here are only for modes normally used for commun; /archives//html/RFI/2014-06/msg00059.html (12,477 bytes)
43. Re: [RFI] Utility coming tomorrow to chase RFI (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 20:06:49 -0700; Same for the TH-F6A. But sensitivity is still pretty decent up to about 530 MHz. 73, _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma; /archives//html/RFI/2014-06/msg00060.html (9,031 bytes)
44. Re: [RFI] Utility coming tomorrow to chase RFI (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 07:37:28 -0400; Thanks Dale. I went through all of those settings with my DJ-X11T but did not notice any significant improvement. Maybe my unit was defective in some way. I found it to be a reasonably competent rece; /archives//html/RFI/2014-06/msg00061.html (10,872 bytes)
45. Re: [RFI] Utility coming tomorrow to chase RFI (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 07:24:41 -0500; Paul, I got memories saved for 75 meters SSB lower, a couple of freq on 2 m. FM, 300 mhz AM (line noise tracking) also 500 Mhz AM, then BCB and 160 m. It is quite a versatile little receiver, but a P; /archives//html/RFI/2014-06/msg00062.html (12,494 bytes)
46. Re: [RFI] Utility coming tomorrow to chase RFI (score: 1): Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 15:16:43 -0400; Is there any reason, other than size & versatility (no Ham tx), to not use a Radio Shack PRO 93 or Pro 94 scanner? They *appear* to receive AM across a broad range. -- Pro-93 25-54, 108-174, 216-225,; /archives//html/RFI/2014-06/msg00063.html (9,196 bytes)
47. Re: [RFI] Utility coming tomorrow to chase RFI (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 13:17:50 -0700; Two reasons that I can think of: 1) they have no signal-strength meter AND they have AGC so telling whether or not you are approaching or going away from the source of noise is very difficult, and 2); /archives//html/RFI/2014-06/msg00064.html (9,296 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 47
Page: [1] [2] [3]